Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$80kArts & Culture$23kHuman Services$21kReligion$20kHealth$17kHousing & Shelter$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$470k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPINE HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS OF TUSCARAWAS$6,000
DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
KSU - TUSC COUNTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,914
TUSC COUNTY CENTRAL CATHOLIC$3,500
TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN ADULTS I$3,500
TUSC CO COUNCIL FOR CHURCH AND COMMUNITY$3,500
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$3,200
AMERICAN LEGION$2,794
CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION$2,500
JUNEBERRY HILL SCHOOLHOUSE$2,500
DOVER FIRST MORAVIAN CHURCH$2,500
ARROWHEAD JOINT FIRE DISTRICT$2,500
BENEATH THE SHADE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL: $5k → 12%DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL: $3k → 12%DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL: $3k → 12%HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 20 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$111k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-9%

Still filing today

35%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO
    3× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +39%
  • DA
    DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • CT
    CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • KT
    KSU TUSC COUNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tuscarawas County Community Foundat
Philanthropy
2
Tuscarawas County Agricultural Soc

The organization's mission is to educate and promote interest in agriculture, household arts, and livestock for residents of tuscarawas county ohio.

Recreation & Sports
3
Tamaqua Historical Society

To preserve the history of tamaqua, pa

—
4
Kutztown Area Historical Society

Collect and preserve area artifacts; maintain the 1892 historical building as a museum which includes the non-circulating historical library; preserve and record the history and culture of kutztown area

Arts & Culture
5
Tuscarawas Clinic for the Working Uninsured

To provide medical and pharmaceutical care to the working uninsured residents of tuscarawas county, ohio. it will also provide health education, referrals and patient advocacy.

Health
6
The Tewksbury Historical Society

Research, preservation and dissemination of the history of the Township of Tewksbury, Hunterdon County, State of New Jersey.

Philanthropy
7
Ashland County Historical Society

To preserve the history of ashland county, ohio, and to provide educational opportunities to read about and experience said history and heritage.

Arts & Culture
8
Tuscola County Community Foundation

To solicit and collect contributions for charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes to benefit the people of and around Tuscola County, Michigan

Philanthropy
9
Clark County Historical Society

The mission of the clark county historical society is to collect, preerve, and interpret resources which provide understanding and appreciation of clark county's heritage, and to relate to the community's past to the present and its future.

Arts & Culture
10
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
11
Tioga County Historical Society

Local historical education operation of a museum and provision of education relating to the history of tioga county pennsylvania

Arts & Culture
12
Washington County Historical Society

Promote an understanding of the history of washington county, ohio by collecting, preserving, and making available to the public, that history, and its relationship to the region beyond washington county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Tuscarawas County Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Philadelphia Band Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTUSCARAWAS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7,828 · OtherTUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIVERSITY: $6,902 · OtherKSU TUSC COUNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,248 · OtherARROWHEAD JOINT FIRE DISTRICT: $5,500 · Other+49 more: $125,600 · Other+49 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterFriends of the Homeless: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterDRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,480 · EducationTUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION: $3,418 · EducationJUNEBERRY HILL SCHOOLHOUSE: $2,500 · EducationTHE TUSCARAWAS VALLEY SCHOOLS TROJAN FOUNDATION IN: $500 · EducationThe Claymont Foundation Inc: $500 · EducationALPINE HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $12,200 · Arts & CultureCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · Community Improvement
Other$162,078Housing & Shelter$16,500Human Services$12,500Education$12,398Arts & Culture$12,200Youth Development$5,000Community Improvement$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL: $10,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION: $3,418 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUNEBERRY HILL SCHOOLHOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUSCARAWAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW PHILADELPHIA BAND BOOSTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBUCKEYE CAREER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Claymont Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPINE HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds DRESS A CHILD FOR SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Homeless ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOAR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds THE TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNEBERRY HILL SCHOOLHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reeves FoundationOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reeves Foundation · Haman Family Foundation Oag #98-1135 · Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation · Stark Community Foundation · Harold & Marjorie Rosenberry Foundation · Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation Trust · John & Orlena Marsh Foundation · Dover Exchange Club Childrens Foundation · Tuscarawas County Community Foundat · Helen V Brach Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · American Electric Power Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph