Skip to content
Deutsch Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Deutsch Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$705kHuman Services$46kHealth$38kEducation$27kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$860Food & Nutrition$360Recreation & Sports$360Other$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL BNEI HAYESHIVOS$36,300
SEFARIA$10,000
MASORES BEIS YAAKOV$9,100
YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH$6,000
ZICHRON YOSEF HACOHEN GMACH$5,000
YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM$5,000
CONGREGATION BAIS SHALOM INC$4,450
FRIENDS OF NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION$1,500
YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM$1,180
KHAL BNEI TORAH$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION$1,000
MIRRER YESHIVA CENTRAL INSTITUTE$750
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KOL TORAH INC$750
BAIS YAAKOV OF THE LOWER EAST SIDE$750
YESHIVA KOL TORAH INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PROJECT LEND A HAND: $2k → 7%OZER DALIM FAMILY ASSIST CHARITABLE ORG INC: $2k → 14%PROJECT LEND A HAND: $1k → 7%PROJECT LEND A HAND: $1k → 7%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 20%TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF STATEN ISLAND: $360 → 11%OORAH: $750 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $360 → 20%NALEH: $360 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%A TIME: $396 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%OUR PLACE IN NY: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 71 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
128

Total granted

$1.0M
$244k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+46%

Still filing today

23%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $26k · revenue +562%
  • YD
    YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • CS
    CONG SHAR HASHAMAYIM
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
11
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ahavas Torah V'chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL BNEI YESHIVAS: $264,510 · OtherKOLLEL BNEI YESHIVASIndividual grant recipient: $84,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEER HATORAH: $75,000 · OtherPEER HATORAHMASORES BAIS YAAKOV: $59,860 · OtherOHR SHRAGA: $58,405 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $46,810 · Other+160 more: $559,807 · Other+160 moreYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $12,800 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,000 · EducationSEFARIA INC: $10,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc: $1,250 · Education+2 more: $580 · EducationBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $25,850 · HealthGREAT GRAND NACHAS AND MORE INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $1,188 · HealthMosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk: $10,000 · ReligionMILWAUKEE KOLLEL INC: $6,000 · ReligionTIFERET TORAH INC: $5,000 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,760 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $1,180 · ReligionKOLLEL KOL AHARON INC CO AVA RABINOWITZ: $1,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $4,375 · Human ServicesPROJECT LEND A HAND INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesOZER DALIM FAMILY ASSISTANCE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $1,180 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $1,050 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $860 · Human Services+3 more: $1,296 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $3,600 · PhilanthropyDOUBLE NACHAS & MORE INC: $3,075 · PhilanthropyYESHIVA OHR YISROEL: $1,000 · PhilanthropySHUVU RETURN INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI AVOS: $2,000 · InternationalMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,148,692Education$35,630Health$32,038Religion$26,440Human Services$18,761Philanthropy$8,675International$2,000Arts & Culture$1,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $25,850 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $14,888 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $12,800 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE KOLLEL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERET TORAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $4,375 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $4,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LEND A HAND INC: $3,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA AHAVAS HATORAH DLAKEWOOD INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOZER DALIM FAMILY ASSISTANCE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $1,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL KOL AHARON INC CO AVA RABINOWITZ: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $576 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEDUSHAS PINCHAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT GESHER INC: $430 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNALEH INC: $360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $188 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds SEFARIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE KOLLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundThe Jimmy and Berta K…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Zichron Chaim Charity…Allen I Gross Charita…Zichron Btz Tzedakah …National Society for …Regina Goldwasser Fou…The Basch Family Foun…Donors Fund Inc
The Ojc FundNY61.4× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deutsch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deutsch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 207 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deutsch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home