Loading…
· Public charity
DESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION
To raise funds for other charitable organizations whose primary function is to care for children in distress and need
$3.2M
Granted FY2025
12
Grants
1
Communities
$285k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Health$3.3MEducation$2.8MHuman Services$2.6MCrime & Legal$1.9MYouth Development$1.1MHousing & Shelter$512kOther$3.1M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
shelterempowerachieveliveshealthseekhope
2020
—
2021
shelterempowerachievehealthokaloosaadvocacyemerald
2022
shelterellisonscholarshiprecipientsseeklivesmental health
2023
clinicellisonscholarshiprecipientsfreemedicalaid
2024
clinicellisonscholarshiprecipientsfreemedicalseek
2025
clinicellisonscholarshiprecipientsbuildmedicalfree
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+2 grants · $545k
$208,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- WALTON HFH$285,000
- BOYS & GIRLS CEC$260,000
- EM COAST CHILD A$230,000
- CHILDREN IN CRIS$228,000
- SACRED HEART FOU$210,000
- EM COAST AUTISM$208,000
- CARING & SHARING$206,000
- ELLISON INGRAM F$200,000
- CHILD VOLU HLTH$180,000
- OPPORTUNITY INC$175,000
- POINT WASH MED$165,000
- MENTAL HEALTH AS$137,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 20 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
20
1
Total granted
$14M
$1.2M
Still filing today
85%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECEMERALD COAST CH6× · 2019–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +72%
- ECEMERALD COAST AU6× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +48%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CEC4× · 2022–2025 · $886k · revenue +74% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- OOOTHER ORGSone grant, 2019 · $1.2M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Florida Keys Childrens Shelter Inc
Provide shelter for children.
Human Services
2
United Way Emerald Coast
Unite people with resources to improve the quality of life in okaloosa and walton counties.
—
3
Eggleston Youth Centers Inc
Provides foster care to the community in areas of group homes, foster homes, adoption, day treatment, family preservation and mental health.
Human Services
4
Gainesville Community Counseling Center
Gainesville Community Counseling Center is a not-for-profit mental health agency, providing exceptional counseling and personal development services to individuals of all ages, couples, and families.
Health
5
Manatee Children's Services Inc
To provide resources, skills, and shelter to alleviate abuse for children and their families.
Crime & Legal
6
The House of Hope Inc
House of hope is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the treatment and support of those suffering from substance use and mental illness. since 1969, house of hope has provided hope and healing throughout south florida to men and women in…
Health
7
Family Hope House Inc
Family hope house empowers families through therapy, education and advocacy. as oklahomas sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.
Health
8
Childrens House International
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
—
9
Youth Haven Inc
Providing home, hope and healing to abused and neglected children and teens in southwest florida.
Human Services
10
Helping Hand Home for Children Inc
A therapeutic home for abused and neglected children
Human Services
11
Childrens Center of Wayne County Inc
The children's center provides behavioral healthcare treatment services for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders or developmental disabilities. the organization also provides foster care, independent living and…
Human Services
12
Life Crisis Center Inc
Counseling & shelter to victims of domestic violence & sexual assault.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emerald Coast Childrens and the most unlike its peers is Ellison Mccraney Ingram Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$3,279,775Other$3,102,247Education$2,830,400Human Services$2,556,000Crime & Legal$1,900,400Youth Development$1,103,000Housing & Shelter$511,800
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMERALD COAST CH ↗
- Who funds EMERALD COAST AU ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN CRIS ↗
- Who funds CVHN ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CEC ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART FOU ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HLTH ASSN ↗
- Who funds ELLISON INGRAM F ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT ↗
- Who funds Point Wash Med ↗
- Who funds SHELTER HOUSE IN ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY PLAC ↗
- Who funds WALTON HFH ↗
- Who funds Caring & Sharing ↗
- Who funds BOYS GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE E ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS FOR CHA ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way Emerald CoastFL29× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way Emerald Coast · Impact 100 of Northwest Florida Inc · The Alys Foundationinc · The St Joe Community Foundation · Dugas Family Foundation Inc · Gulf Power Foundationinc · Emerald Coast Community Wellness · The Bear Family Foundation Inc · The Emeril Lagasse Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MENTAL HLTH ASSN.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~17 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 593282067 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MENTAL HLTH ASSN, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Destin Charity Wine Auction?
Find your warmest path to Destin Charity Wine Auction through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines