Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf

To inspire and invest in dermpas to succeed in professional development and philanthropic service to impact communities and provide inclusion for all.

$13k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2022
100%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$12,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$12,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$258k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 100% of the organizations Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$13k0%
FY20221$25k100%
FY20211$17k100%
FY20202$33k100%
FY20182$24k50%
FY20173$36kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$54kHealth$40kScience & Tech$25kInternational$20kYouth Development$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Utah Valley University$29,5002n/a
Ucb Inc$25,0001n/a
The Corporation of Mercer University$24,57710%
Childrens Skin Disease Foundation$22,19425%
Americares Foundation Inc$20,00010%
National Alopecia Areata Foundation$9,4951n/a
Wigs For Kids Inc$8,30011%
Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Inc$7,96014%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf with peer funders

About Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf

How much does Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf give?
Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf reported 1 grants totaling $12,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (37%), Health (27%), Science & Tech (17%).
Who are Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Utah Valley University ($30k), Ucb Inc ($25k), The Corporation of Mercer University ($25k).
Does Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf based?
Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dermatology Pa Foundation Dpaf’s filings →

More from the funding graph