Skip to content

· Public charity

Defending Democracy Together Institute

To elevate and assemble pro-democracy voices in an effort to educate the public about the essential function and value of american democracy and to encourage innovative thinking about how to solve the emerging challenges facing america.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$12MPublic Benefit$3.6MEducation$1.1MCivil Rights$365kInternational$200kReligion$200k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $525k
  • $250k+5 grants · $14M
$315,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE$12,150,000
THE LIBERAL PATRIOT INC$1,000,000
SOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW & DEMOCRACY$500,000
PRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION INC$400,000
ETERNAL VIGILANCE ACTION$315,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$150,000
MORMON WOMEN FOR ETHICAL GOVERNMENT FOUNDATION$150,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT INC$100,000
DEMOCRACY A JOURNAL OF IDEAS INC$75,000
CENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%REDEEMING BABEL: $200k → 8%THE FOUNDATION FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT INC: $100k → 17%THE LIBERAL PATRIOT: $1.3M → 14%MORMON WOMEN FOR THE ETHICAL GOVERNMENT FOUNDATION: $150k → 8%ETERNAL VIGILANCE ACTION: $315k → 6%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%SOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW & DEMOCRACY INC: $450k → 14%MORMON WOMEN FOR ETHICAL GOVERNMENT FOUNDATION: $150k → 8%PRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%CENTER FOR NEW AMERICAN SECURITY: $200k → 14%INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE: $12.2M → 14%THE LIBERAL PATRIOT INC: $1.0M → 14%SOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW & DEMOCRACY: $500k → 14%PRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $400k → 14%CENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: $50k → 14%DEMOCRACY A JOURNAL OF IDEAS INC: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 4 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$4.4M
$400k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Civil RightsEducationPhilanthropySocial SciencePublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIBERAL PATRIOT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.3M · revenue -78% · 93% of their budget
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $950k · 86% of their budget
  • PF
    PRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $800k · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • GF
    Good Faith Network Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -29%
  • CF
    Center for a New American Security Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Press Watch

To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.

—
2
Institute for New Global Politics Inc

The Institute for New Global Politics is a California-based educational nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. It is an independent and nonpartisan thinktank dedicated to educating the general…

International
3
The Conversationalist
—
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
First Look Institute Inc

First Look Institute supports fearless investigative journalism, innovative and cinematic nonfiction filmmaking, and press freedom initiatives to protect the right to a free and open society and press.

Arts & Culture
7
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
8
Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies Inc

To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.

Education
9
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
10
Principles First for America Ltd

We are a nationwide grassroots movement of people who share a love of american democracy and concern for the direction of our existing leadership. we've watched as institutions on the right have been co-opted by bad-faith actors willing to…

—
11
The Institute for Cultural Evolution

To advance political evolution in america to outgrow the hyper-partisan polarization that threatens our democracy.

Social Science
12
The Libertarian Institute

Disseminate information and education about pertinent economic, social and governmental topics, via print, web and other media to educate the public about the principles of LIbertarianism.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Principles First for America Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for Equal Opportunity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE INC: $12,150,000 · PhilanthropyINDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE INCTHE LIBERAL PATRIOT INC: $2,300,000 · Civil RightsTHE LIBERAL PATRIOT IN…PRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 · Civil RightsPRINCIPLES FIRST FOR A…Eternal Vigilance Action Inc: $315,000 · Civil RightsEternal Vigilance Acti…SOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY INC: $950,250 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationDEMOCRACY A JOURNAL OF IDEAS INC: $75,000 · EducationMormon Women For Ethical Government Foun dation: $300,000 · Public BenefitGood Faith Network Inc: $200,000 · ReligionCenter for a New American Security Inc: $200,000 · InternationalTHE FOUNDATION FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT INC: $100,000 · Social ScienceCENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: $50,000 · Other
Philanthropy$12,150,000Civil Rights$3,415,000Education$1,175,250Public Benefit$300,000Religion$200,000International$200,000Social Science$100,000Other$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIBERAL PATRIOT INC: $2,300,000 over 2y, 93% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY INC: $950,250 over 2y, 86% of budgetPRINCIPLES FIRST FOR AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetEternal Vigilance Action Inc: $315,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetMormon Women For Ethical Government Foun dation: $300,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetGood Faith Network Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCenter for a New American Security Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetDEMOCRACY A JOURNAL OF IDEAS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: $50,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Defending Democracy Together Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Defending Democracy Together Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Defending Democracy Together Institute?

Find your warmest path to Defending Democracy Together Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Defending Democracy Together Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph