· Private foundation
DeAngelis Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES | $83,333 |
| BRADLEY HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MLMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC7× · 2018–2024 · $633k · revenue +94%
- RCREFUGE CORPORATION2× · 2018–2019 · $210k · revenue +39% · 95% of their budget
- CHCraig Hospital Foundation4× · 2018–2021 · $50k · revenue +175%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Texasone grant, 2022 · $50k
- SESt Edwards Universityone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -4%
- KTKIPP Texas Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +681%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.
To improve patient care by advancing the science & practice of clinical nutrition & metabolism.
See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…
To foster the independence and dignity of homebound seniors in montgomery county by providing them with nutritious meals, transportation, and caring connections.
Craig Hospital is a 93-bed, long-term acute care and rehabilitation hospital that provides care exclusively for patients with spinal cord and brain injury. The Hospital provides a comprehensive system of inpatient and outpatient medical…
Organization provides services to senior citizens and the disabled, primarily through home-delivered meals and congregate meals.
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
To enrich, empower and elevate people thorughout life's journey.
To advance the Kingdom of God with specific focus on human health and well-being, through grants, research and initiatives in support of the mission of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas.
Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.
To promote quality care in long term health care facilities through education and research.
St. Peter Catholic High School empowers students to be models of faith through Catholic spiritual formation, while providing a creative and comprehensive education in career and technical pathways.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Pease Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds St Edwards University ↗
- Who funds LS CLASSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIPP Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE ASPEN ↗
- Who funds Creative Action ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization DeAngelis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DeAngelis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on DeAngelis Family’s filings →