Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dean M Graham Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$77kScience & Tech$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kHealth$21kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
7
States reached
$566k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,000
STATE UNIVERSITY NY$7,000
HARTWICK COLLEGE$6,300
SUNY COBLESKILL$5,000
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY$2,500
NATL FOUNDATION CANCER$1,900
Individual grant recipient$1,500
MiSci$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ACCRF$1,000
COMMUNITY LIBRARY$817
JEFFERSON CENTRAL SCHOOL$750
ALZHEIMER ASSOC$750
FRIENDS OF FIVE RIVERS$750
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CO
NE
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 31 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$227k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+11%

Still filing today

35%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    Hartwick College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +8%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +46%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FIVE RIVERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • GS
    GILBOA-CONESVILLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
4
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
5
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

To advance and disseminate the science and practice of hepatology, and to promote liver health and quality patient care.

Health
8
National Marrow Donor Program

We save lives through cellular therapy.

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
11
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
12
Lupus Research Alliance Inc

Putting people with lupus at the center of all we do, the lupus research alliance drives the discovery & development of next generation lupus diagnostics and curative treatments through innovative research & collaborations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Community Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATE UNIVERSITY NY: $27,000 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY NYSUNY COBLESKILL: $25,500 · OtherSUNY COBLESKILLIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $8,250 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCENATL FOUNDATION CANCER: $7,850 · OtherNATL FOUNDATION CANCERIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherMiSci: $5,500 · OtherJEFFERSON CENTRAL SCHOOL: $4,800 · Other+23 more: $40,025 · Other+23 moreHartwick College: $46,800 · EducationHartwick CollegeTHE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $3,867 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY LIBRARYTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,500 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…American Heart Association Inc: $3,500 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,850 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,150 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $500 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $450 · HealthFRIENDS OF FIVE RIVERS INC: $6,750 · EnvironmentNMDP FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$134,425Education$53,167Human Services$32,000Health$7,450Environment$6,750Philanthropy$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHartwick College: $46,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FIVE RIVERS INC: $6,750 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $3,867 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUDLEY OBSERVATORY OF THE CITY OF ALBANY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hartwick College ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FIVE RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DUDLEY OBSERVATORY OF THE CITY OF ALBANY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dean M Graham Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dean M Graham Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dean M Graham’s filings →

    More from the funding graph