Skip to content

· Private foundation

David T and Dorris E Staples Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$476kRecreation & Sports$295kHuman Services$286kEducation$230kCrime & Legal$76kPublic Benefit$21kSocial Science$12kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CCAE Trust$255,000
Interfaith Community Services$40,000
California Center for the Arts$36,650
CSUSM$25,000
Richards Institute$10,000
Vista Adult School$10,000
Escondido Educational Foundation$5,000
Fallbrook Senior Care$5,000
Green Acres Interactive Therapy$5,000
Empower Me Up$5,000
Fallbrook Union school District$1,000
San Pasqual High School Band$1,000
Friends of the Fallbrook Library$750
Fallbrook High School$500
Poway United School District$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Green Acres Interactive Therapy: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-15%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UB
    UPWARD BOUND CAMP FOR PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $295k · revenue +24% · 53% of their budget
  • IC
    Interfaith Community Services Inc
    4× · 2018–2022 · $264k · revenue +79%
  • EC
    ESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $41k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • BE
    Bonsall Education Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -40%
  • KC
    KIDS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -10%
  • EC
    EAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Gabriel Educational Foundation

Support programs at schools in SGVUSD

Education
2
San Marcos Middle School Band Boosters Club

To Promote interest in music & education

Education
3
San Elijo Middle School Band Booster Club

Enhancing interest in music and the arts

Education
4
Verdugo Young Musicians a California Non-Profit Corporation

Youth Orchestra

Arts & Culture
5
The Santa Ynez Valley Family School

The family school is dedicated to providing a superior environment of child centered academic and creative programs which inspire a joy of learning and support critical thinking. we strive to prepare students to be compassionate,…

Education
6
Bridge California

Education

Education
7
Fallbrook Art Association

Promote art and artists in the communities of Fallbrook and Bonsall.

—
8
Conejo Oaks Symphony Inc

Provide musical training and instruction for 250 students. The youth orchestra performs concerts.

Arts & Culture
9
San Diego County Philatelic Council

To promote stamp collecting

—
10
Friends of the Goleta Valley Librar

Provide financial support to the Goleta Valley Library Goleta CA.

—
11
San Diego Early Music Society

The San Diego Early Music Society (SDEMS) fosters the appreciation and performance of early music (music of the Medieval, Renaissance, and Baroque periods) in the greater San Diego area through concert presentations. SDEMS seeks to…

—
12
Fallbrook Child Development Center Inc

We provide quality early childhood education and day care for children ages one to five years. We strive to promote each childs intellectual, emotional, social, and physical development in preparation for kindergarten.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fallbrook Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is Empower Me Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPWARD BOUND CAMP FOR PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NE: $295,000 · OtherUPWARD BOUND CAMP FOR PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEInterfaith Community Services Inc: $264,434 · OtherInterfaith Community Services IncCCAE Trust: $255,000 · OtherCCAE TrustCSUSM: $200,820 · OtherCSUSMCalifornia Center for the Arts: $172,917 · OtherCalifornia Center for the Arts+15 more: $62,801 · OtherEMPOWER ME UP: $76,000 · Crime & LegalESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $41,436 · Arts & CultureEAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,484 · Arts & CulturePANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $20,500 · Public BenefitBonsall Education Foundation: $6,000 · EducationKIDS COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationWESTMONT COLLEGE: $2,233 · EducationFRIENDS OF FALLBROOK LIBRARY: $750 · EducationGREEN ACRES INTERACTIVE THERAPY INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,250,972Crime & Legal$76,000Arts & Culture$45,920Public Benefit$20,500Education$12,983Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPWARD BOUND CAMP FOR PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NE: $295,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $264,434 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEMPOWER ME UP: $76,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetPANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $20,500 over 2y, 78% of budgetBonsall Education Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetGREEN ACRES INTERACTIVE THERAPY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKIDS COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE: $2,233 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFALLBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,484 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR WELLBEING: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF FALLBROOK LIBRARY: $750 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPWARD BOUND CAMP FOR PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NE ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER ME UP ↗
  • Who funds ESCONDIDO CHORAL ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA TEEN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Bonsall Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREEN ACRES INTERACTIVE THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FALLBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR WELLBEING ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FALLBROOK LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David T and Dorris E Staples Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David T and Dorris E Staples Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Upward Bound Camp for Persons With Special Ne: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David T and Dorris E Staples Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David T and Dorris E Staples Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David T and Dorris E Staples’ filings →

More from the funding graph