Skip to content

· Private foundation

David P Wheatland Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$488k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$911kArts & Culture$845kEnvironment$410kScience & Tech$338kHousing & Shelter$125kHealth$107kRecreation & Sports$60kEducation$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $465k
$80,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM$175,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
HOUGHTON LIBRARY$80,000
LOVELANE$55,038
PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY$55,000
PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM$22,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOVELANE: $60k → 8%PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM: $175k → 10%NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM: $75k → 16%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $80k → 8%MID PENNINSULA HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 9%CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $10k → 16%SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $10k → 9%ALDER PLANTARIUM: $125k → 14%Hanover Improvement Society: $5k → 10%Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry - Ellsworth: $17k → 11%Penobscot Marine Museum: $51k → 13%LOVELANE: $55k → 8%PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM: $75k → 10%NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM: $60k → 16%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $75k → 8%Mid Penninsula High School: $30k → 9%ALDER PLANTARIUM: $100k → 14%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $23k → 13%LOVELANE: $47k → 8%NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM: $52k → 16%ALDER PLANTARIUM: $100k → 14%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $22k → 13%Houghton Library: $263k → 8%NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM: $52k → 16%ALDER PLANTARIUM: $90k → 14%PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $12k → 13%COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $238k → 8%NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM: $50k → 16%ALDER PLANTARIUM: $50k → 14%PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $159k → 13%COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $220k → 8%Courageous Sailing Center of Boston Inc: $60k → 16%PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $89k → 13%HOUGHTON LIBRARY: $80k → 8%PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $80k → 13%HOUGHTON LIBRARY: $80k → 8%PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $75k → 13%HOUGHTON LIBRARY: $65k → 8%PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $55k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 10 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+4%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    Houghton Library
    4× · 2022–2025 · $488k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $465k
  • CO
    COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $458k

Funded once

  • CS
    COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +35%
  • LF
    Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry - Ellsworth
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
2
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
3
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
4
Seacoast Science Center Inc

It is the mission of the seacoast science center to spark curiosity, enhance understanding, and inspire conservation of our blue planet. the center's programming and exhibits encourage visitors and other program participants to recognize…

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Worlds Aquarium

Marine Conservation

—
7
Uss Constitution Museum Inc

The uss constitution museum engages all ages in the story of "old ironsides" to spark excitement about maritime heritage, naval service, and the american experience.

Arts & Culture
8
Camden Shipyard Maritime Museum

To educate the world about camden's rich maritime heritage and significant contributions to global shipbuilding and seafaring exploration.

Arts & Culture
9
The Maritime Aquarium At Norwalk Inc

The maritime aquarium at norwalk seeks to ignite a connection to long island sound and the ocean to enrich the lives of all people and inspire action to protect our blue planet.

Arts & Culture
10
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
11
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

—
12
Museum of Science

The mission of the museum of science is to inspire a lifelong love of science in everyone. through exhibits, curricula, programs, and events, both live and virtual, we aim to make science and scientific thinking accessible, engaging, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Aquarium Corporation; the most unlike its peers is International Snow Leopard Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Houghton Library: $488,422 · OtherHoughton LibraryIndividual grant recipient: $465,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $458,000 · OtherCOLLECTION OF HISTORICAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS HARVARD UNIVERSIT…LOVELANE: $162,083 · OtherLOVELANEMid Penninsula High School: $60,000 · OtherCOURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INC: $60,000 · Other+2 more: $27,000 · OtherPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $457,500 · AnimalsPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARYNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $288,100 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATIONTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $155,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $250,000 · Arts & CulturePEABODY ESSEX…PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $106,500 · Arts & CulturePENOBSCOT MAR…HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,720,505Animals$910,600Arts & Culture$356,500Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $457,500 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $288,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $155,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $106,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCOURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David P Wheatland Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David P Wheatland Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Courageous Sailing Center for Youth Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David P Wheatland’s filings →

More from the funding graph