Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Neal Pennington Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$64kInternational$46kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$8kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIDS ASSISTANCE PROJECT$7,000
ST JUDES$3,600
SAN DIEGO LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
AMFAR$3,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$3,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$3,000
SPECIAL DELIVERY SAN DIEGO (MEAL DELIVERY)$3,000
MAKE A WISH$2,000
PROMISES 2 KIDS$2,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$1,000
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $900 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $900 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $400 → 14%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 21 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -91% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$165k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-91%

Still filing today

62%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL FOOD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +452%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +802%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DO
    DAWN OF A NEW DAY ANIMAL RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
6
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
7
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
8
Providence Trinitycare Hospice

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
9
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
10
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

—
11
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
12
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Dawn of a New Day Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIDS ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $46,000 · OtherAIDS ASSISTANCE PROJECTSPECIAL DELIVERY SAN DIEGO (MEAL DELIVERY): $12,000 · OtherSPECIAL DELIVERY SAN DIEGO (MEAL DELIVERY)THE CENTER (GAY YOUTH CENTER): $7,500 · OtherTHE CENTER (GAY YOUTH CENTER)AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYMAKE A WISH: $3,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $5,500 · Other+4 moreTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $19,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCHPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $19,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOODST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL …HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONDAP Health Inc: $3,700 · HealthDAP Health IncCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $3,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTYTREVOR PROJECT INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsTREVOR PR…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $2,750 · Human ServicesFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter: $3,200 · AnimalsDAWN OF A NEW DAY ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,000 · AnimalsFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $2,000 · Food & NutritionMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$82,500Health$56,300Civil Rights$14,500Human Services$6,550Animals$5,200Food & Nutrition$4,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $19,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDAP Health Inc: $3,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter: $3,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAWN OF A NEW DAY ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAWN OF A NEW DAY ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Neal Pennington Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Neal Pennington Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Neal Pennington’s filings →

More from the funding graph