Skip to content

· Private foundation

David J Harb Charitable Trust James F Hassan Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$125kHuman Services$86kReligion$42kEducation$12kFood & Nutrition$12kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$4k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$12,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$12,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SUICIDE PREV$2,000
CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION$2,000
XAVARIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$2,000
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION$1,000
SAINT GEORGE ORTHODOX CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE HOSPICE CARE: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$242k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+33%

Still filing today

62%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +90%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $74k · revenue +145%
  • CO
    CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • FF
    FOREVER FARM
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • HS
    Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
6
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
7
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $74,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL IN…American Heart Association Inc: $15,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $6,000 · Health+2 moreSAINT GEORGE ORTHODOX CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherSAINT GEORGE ORTHODOX CHURCHFOREVER FARM: $12,000 · OtherFOREVER FARMST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITALXAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherXAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOLAMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SUICIDE PREV: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION OF SUICIDE PREVALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $4,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCCIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesDISABLED AND LIMBLESS VETERANS INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $4,000 · International
Health$100,000Other$89,000Human Services$88,000Philanthropy$4,000International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $74,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED AND LIMBLESS VETERANS INC: $4,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AND LIMBLESS VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David J Harb Charitable Trust James F Hassan Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David J Harb Charitable Trust James F Hassan Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David J Harb Charitable Trust James F Hassan Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph