Skip to content
David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$165kPhilanthropy$118kInternational$63kArts & Culture$42kHealth$11kEducation$11kHuman Services$9kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$62k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$16,832
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NJ$6,653
Individual grant recipient$5,609
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC$5,400
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$5,000
THE SHUL OF BAL HARBOR$4,120
ALTNEU SYNAGOGUE$2,500
EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE$2,000
EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC$1,800
MISCELLANEOUS - VARIOUS$1,507
THE ALEPH INSTITUTE$1,040
SINAI SCHOOL$1,000
SHARSHERET$1,000
BELEV ECHAD$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $250 → 7%THE BLUE CARD INC: $450 → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $100 → 17%OUR PLACE IN NEW YORK INC: $522 → 20%OUR PLACE IN NEW YORK INC: $378 → 20%OUR PLACE IN NEW YORK INC: $250 → 20%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $200 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $200 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $200 → 7%OUR PLACE NY: $54 → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $1k → 17%DOROT INC: $180 → 17%DOROT INC: $180 → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 51 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
59

Total granted

$227k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

41%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
The Jerusalem Connection
—
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
10
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Year Abroad

To provide an education based program in israel for college age jewish young adults that will instill students with a sense of purpose, commitment & pride about

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva Alumni Basketball Association Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/66
Grantees still filing
40/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $49,309 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST HILL SYNAGOGUE: $26,483 · OtherEAST HILL SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient: $18,478 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,596 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC: $10,312 · OtherSINAI SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF BAL HARBOUR: $9,326 · Other+66 more: $81,649 · Other+66 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $70,913 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN …GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $38,132 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATIO…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $5,400 · Philanthropy+7 more: $3,560 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $39,500 · EducationINTERNATIO…+4 more: $625 · EducationEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $9,100 · InternationalEMUNAH OF…ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $6,400 · InternationalISRAEL TE…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 · InternationalThe Ameri…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,084 · InternationalJEWISH NA…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,550 · InternationalFRIENDS O…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGH…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,980 · InternationalAMERICAN …ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $1,200 · International+4 more: $2,592 · International+4 moreHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $3,000 · ReligionYESHIVA ALUMNI BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION CORPORATION: $1,800 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,200 · ReligionAish International Inc: $1,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM GREAT SYNAGOGUE INC: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $50 · ReligionBELEV ECHAD INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $1,204 · Human ServicesProject Ezra: $1,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $600 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD INC: $550 · Human ServicesDOROT INC: $360 · Human ServicesVaad Hatzedaka Inc: $360 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,300 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $1,500 · HealthREFUAH HEALTH CENTER INC: $920 · HealthSTARDUST JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $750 · HealthRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC: $450 · HealthBEAR GIVERS INC: $250 · Health+1 more: $100 · Health
Other$221,153Philanthropy$118,005Education$40,125International$34,906Religion$8,050Human Services$7,574Health$7,270

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $70,913 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $39,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $38,132 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $9,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $6,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,084 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,959 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ALUMNI BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION CORPORATION: $1,800 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCAT Inc: $1,630 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADRAIGOS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $1,204 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $1,132 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM GREAT SYNAGOGUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezra: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREFUAH HEALTH CENTER INC: $920 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaka Rescue & Recovery Inc: $900 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSTARDUST JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMet Council Inc: $696 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $480 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR GIVERS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY CHEST OF ENGLEWOOD: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHANTI HOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARDUST FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD PBA LOCAL #216: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frisch School: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ALUMNI BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds SCAT Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcThe Daniel E and Joyc…Kolatch Family Founda…David & Esther Musche…Jewish Community Foun…Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Federation of …The Goldman Sachs Cha…Bemak 2014 Family Fou…The Goldberg Family C…The Lee and Cheryl La…
Jewish Communal FundNY39× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · Kolatch Family Foundation · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Bemak 2014 Family Foundation Sullman and Nancy Bemak Ttee · The Goldberg Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lee and Cheryl Lasher Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Adrienne Greenblatt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home