Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dauten Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Social Science$71MHealth$21MScience & Tech$6.0MEducation$1.5MArts & Culture$1.2MPublic Benefit$925kHuman Services$840k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $500k
  • $250k+5 grants · $18M
$225,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MILKEN INSTITUTE$13,591,510
FOUNTAIN HOUSE$1,955,694
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$1,000,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$728,000
JOSSELYN CENTER$500,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$225,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY$150,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS$125,000
BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE$5,000
POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BROAD INSTITUTE: $150k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $689k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $511k → 9%THE PODIUM SOCIETY: $250k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $500k → 8%JOSSELYN CENTER: $500k → 14%BROAD INSTITUTE: $150k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $225k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $504k → 9%THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $28.1M → 14%JOSSELYN CENTER: $500k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $2.7M → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY: $739k → 16%THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $19.8M → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.8M → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY: $535k → 16%THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $13.6M → 14%LUTHERN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $250k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY: $500k → 16%THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $9.3M → 14%WETA (GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION): $900k → 7%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $1.0M → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1.5M → 16%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $318k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY: $300k → 16%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $2.9M → 17%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $138k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $975k → 16%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $2.0M → 17%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY: $150k → 16%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $1.8M → 17%THE KENNEDY FORUM: $350k → 14%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $1.0M → 17%FOUNTAIN HOUSE: $250k → 17%THE KENNEDY FORUM: $325k → 14%THE KENNEDY FORUM: $250k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOPITAL OF CHICAGO: $801k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $735k → 14%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $728k → 14%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $529k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $265k → 14%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $250k → 14%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $221k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $200k → 14%DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $395k → 14%DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $140k → 14%DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $135k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
UT
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92M · 15 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$92M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+30%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $738k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $71M · revenue +42%
  • FH
    FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +78%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2018–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $900k · revenue +30%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • PS
    Podium Society Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +17% · 25% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
9
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
10
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
11
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
12
Rush System for Health

The mission of Rush University System for Health is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities it serves through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research, and community partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Illinois; the most unlike its peers is Podium Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
16/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $70,769,065 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE+12 more: $7,751,521 · Other+12 moreFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $7,924,599 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE IN…Children's Hospital Corporation: $3,414,207 · HealthChildren's Hospit…Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $2,000,032 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lu…MAYO CLINIC: $1,015,567 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $1,010,000 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENT…+4 more: $470,000 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,009,008 · EducationGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $900,018 · Arts & CulturePodium Society Inc: $250,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$78,520,586Health$15,834,405Education$7,009,008Arts & Culture$1,150,018

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $70,769,065 over 4y, 10% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $7,924,599 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,009,008 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $3,414,207 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $2,000,032 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,015,567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP: $1,010,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $900,018 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $839,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPodium Society Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National: $115,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Podium Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH LDRSHP ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dauten Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dauten Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dauten Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph