Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dannahower Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$38kYouth Development$14kReligion$11kHealth$9kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kAnimals$1kEnvironment$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK$5,000
MUSTARD SEED$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$1,000
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN$500
CATSNIP$500
TREASURE COAST HOSPICE$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$200
HEATHCOTE BOTANICAL GARDENS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $500 → 16%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $500 → 16%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $325 → 16%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $325 → 16%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $325 → 16%CHRISTOPHERS HAVEN: $325 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$81k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+59%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +99%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • CH
    Christopher's Haven Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IT
    IN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +59%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • O
    ORCA
    one grant, 2024 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Icing Smiles Inc

Icing Smiles Inc. provides custom celebration cakes to critically ill children and to their siblings.

Youth Development
2
Hospice of Stanly County Inc

At tillery compassionate care, we spark inspiration, hope, and peace enabling individuals with serious illness to embrace their spirit of life.

Human Services
3
Tsic Inc

Provides mentors, college scholarships and hope to low-income at-risk students in florida.

Crime & Legal
4
Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals
5
Sunny Crest Home Inc

In a Christian-living, home-like atmosphere, we endeavor to provide ample opportunity for personal growth while focusing on bringing out the best in each individual, giving their light a chance to shine.

Human Services
6
In Christ Ministries Inc

Bring the message of grace and truth to children teens and adults.

Religion
7
Habitat for Humanity St Augustine

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

8
Interfaith Charities of South Lee Inc

The mission of ICSL is to assist those in need in south Lee County, Florida by providing food, rent and utilities assistance; feeding school children during summer vacation; preparing tax returns at no cost; registering clients for various…

Human Services
9
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

10
Keep Lee County Beautiful Inc

The mission of Keep Lee County Beautiful, Inc. is to inspire, educate, and engage the Lee County community in improving, beautifying, and protecting our environment.

Environment
11
Habitat for Humanity of Collier

Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is part of a global, nonprofit housing Organization operated on Christian principles that seeks to put God's love into action by building homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter
12
St Lucie County Education

To enhance public education for prekindergarten through the 12th grade.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Stlucie and the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $38,450 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $13,800 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBMUSTARD SEED — $11,050 · OtherMUSTARD SEEDSMILE TRAIN INC — $6,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCTREASURE COAST HOSPICE — $2,300 · OtherTREASURE COAST HOSPICE+5 more — $3,400 · Other+5 moreINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationIN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC — $4,000 · HealthChristopher's Haven Inc — $2,300 · Human ServicesHEATHCOTE BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $800 · Environment
Food & Nutrition$38,450Other$36,550Education$5,000Health$4,000Human Services$2,300Environment$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $38,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChristopher's Haven Inc — $2,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEATHCOTE BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $800 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds IN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC
  • Who funds Christopher's Haven Inc
  • Who funds HEATHCOTE BOTANICAL GARDENS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dannahower Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph