Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$333kReligion$193kInternational$62kPhilanthropy$49kHuman Services$41kHealth$29kFood & Nutrition$3kCommunity Improvement$15Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,285
Median grant
4
States reached
$501k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAT NOAM$50,010
TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY$40,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER$18,000
CONGREGATION BETH AARON$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER$5,000
FRIENDS OF NEVE MICHAEL CHILDRENS VILLAG$5,000
PROJECT YECHI$4,000
CONGREGATION RINAT YISROEL$2,556
DONATIONS UNDER 1000$2,285
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EMUNAH OF AMERICA$1,800
ROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY$1,080
SHARSHERET$1,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT$1,000
NECHAMA COMFORT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $21k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ELIEZER 11-3459: $9k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $3k → 11%NECHAMA COMFORT: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$508k · 15 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
32

Total granted

$508k
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

60%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVAT SHALSHELET INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $253k · revenue +420%
  • TA
    TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $80k · revenue +32%
  • PY
    PROJECT YECHI INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRNDS OF NEVE CHILDREN VILLAGE 2085
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • LE
    LEV ECHAD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
5
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
8
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
9
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
10
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
11
Yeshivas Nachlas Sofrim Inc

To cultivate students' intellectual, moral and creative capacities to the fullest by transmitting the necessary skills and methods that enable students to master all areas of torah scholarship.

Religion
12
American Friends of Tzohar

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids of Courage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
7/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAT SHALSHELET INC: $252,520 · EducationYESHIVAT SHALSHELET INCYESHIVAT NOAM: $50,010 · EducationYESHIVAT NOAM+4 more: $23,400 · Education+4 moreTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $80,000 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTYFRIENDS OF NEVE MICHAEL CHILDRENS VILLAG: $25,300 · OtherFRIENDS OF NEVE MICHAEL CHILDRENS VILLAGCONGREGATION BETH AARON OF TEANECK: $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH AARON OF TEANECKAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER: $18,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDERFRNDS OF NEVE CHILDREN VILLAGE 2085: $15,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM: $11,000 · OtherCONGREGATION RINAT YISRAEL: $10,746 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH AARON XXX-XX-XXXX: $10,000 · OtherYESHURUN ORGANIZATION 13-6104086: $10,000 · Other+29 more: $82,318 · Other+29 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $48,460 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT YECHI INC: $23,500 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $3,500 · HealthLEV ECHAD INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $6,000 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $1,800 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $3,600 · Youth Development
Education$325,930Other$287,364Human Services$49,460Health$27,000Philanthropy$14,000International$7,800Youth Development$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT SHALSHELET INC: $252,520 over 3y, 12% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $50,010 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $48,460 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLEV ECHAD INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTzohar Halev Inc: $8,300 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMEIRAS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Frisch School: $6,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $3,080 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $2,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NEWS SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECHAMACOMFORT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHALSHELET INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Tzohar Halev Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEIRAS BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frisch School ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OF COURAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY27× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Granit Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Ma Tov Charitable Foundation Co Sam Vogel · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · The Eva & Mordy Rothberg Family Foundation Inc · Drharold Rosenbaum Memorial Foundation · Stern Family Foundation · Ruth R Greenberg Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Meiras Bais Yaakov Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel and Miriam Michael’s filings →

More from the funding graph