Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dane G Hansen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
346
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$17MHuman Services$16MFood & Nutrition$15MPhilanthropy$15MCommunity Improvement$12MHousing & Shelter$10MHealth$7.3MArts & Culture$6.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 346 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k119 grants · $432k
  • $10k–50k103 grants · $2.2M
  • $50k–250k98 grants · $9.0M
  • $250k+26 grants · $16M
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$367M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANE G HANSEN SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$2,079,228
CITY OF LOGAN$1,606,910
NCRPC$1,185,000
GNWKCF$1,000,000
FORT HAYS TECH NORTH CENTRAL$1,000,000
NWKEICI$996,813
NWKEICI$954,908
NWKEICI$802,556
NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH$799,355
CITY OF LOGAN$605,517
FHSU FOUNDATION$500,000
GNWKCF$412,500
GNWKFC$412,500
NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN$350,000
CITIZENS FOUNDATION$350,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREELEY-WALLACE CO HEALTHCARE FDN: $10k → 10%NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH: $799k → 16%NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH: $669k → 16%NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC: $580k → 16%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $175k → 10%SYLVAN SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 11%NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC: $19k → 16%HIGH POINT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $100k → 10%SUNSET HOME INC: $116k → 13%HIGH POINT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $100k → 10%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $24k → 12%LINCOLN SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 11%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $20k → 12%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $18k → 12%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $15k → 12%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $350k → 16%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $14k → 12%SMITH CO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $50k → 11%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $13k → 10%DSNWK: $120k → 14%SMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FDN: $10k → 12%DSNWK: $100k → 14%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $45k → 13%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $42k → 13%DSNWK: $100k → 14%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $8k → 10%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $26k → 13%SMITH CO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 11%CONCORDIA SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 13%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $23k → 13%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $31k → 16%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $19k → 13%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $18k → 16%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $18k → 16%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $17k → 16%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $16k → 13%NORTON AREA CHILD CARE ASSN: $14k → 16%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSN: $11k → 13%HOSPICE SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS: $91k → 12%GLEN ELDER SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $5k → 12%HUCK BOYD FDN: $14k → 12%HOSPICE SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS: $12k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER: $12k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER: $8k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $7k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER: $6k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 12%PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Dane G Hansen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in KS; by stated purpose, 94%.

Dane G Hansen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97M · 178 repeat orgs$22M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

178 repeat relationships: 107 still active in FY2025, 71 since wound down; 103 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

178
268

Total granted

$97M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +17% · 80% of their budget
  • CF
    CITIZENS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $722k · revenue +1% · 49% of their budget
  • NA
    NORTON AREA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $449k · revenue +84% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • LP
    LIFE PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $3.3M
  • VC
    VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +9% · 33% of their budget
  • GH
    GROW HAYS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $385k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln County Economic Dev Foundation

To encourage and support economic development in lincoln county, kansas.

Community Improvement
2
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
3
Kansas Grazing Lands Coalition Inc

To regenerate kansas grazing land resources through cooperative management, economics, ecology, production, education and technical assistance programs.

Food & Nutrition
4
Kansas Association of Conservation Districts

Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas

Community Improvement
5
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
6
Kansas Farmers Union Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
7
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
8
Kansas Sampler Foundation Inc

To preserve and sustain rural culture. to educate kansans about kansas (to create a thoughtful audience for communities) and network & support rural communities.

Arts & Culture
9
South Central Community Foundation

To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
10
Pivotal Health & Wellness Inc

Provide healthcare services and resources to courtland kansas and the surrounding rural communities.

Health
11
Scott County Historical Society Inc

Preservation study and collection of historical items

—
12
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Kansas Community Network; the most unlike its peers is North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 554 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/111
Grantees still filing
65/111
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GNWKCF: $19,931,828 · OtherGNWKCFNWKEICI: $12,537,576 · OtherNWKEICIDANE G HANSEN SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $8,911,503 · OtherDANE G HANSEN SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMLIFE - USD #326: $6,769,023 · OtherLIFE - USD #326NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION: $6,385,000 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIONGSCF: $3,982,500 · OtherCITY OF LOGAN: $3,586,385 · Other+156 more: $42,384,153 · Other+156 moreNEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC: $2,067,210 · Human ServicesNORTON AREA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION: $448,597 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC: $319,935 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $195,733 · Human ServicesSALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $170,532 · Human Services+5 more: $436,933 · Human ServicesCITIZENS FOUNDATION: $722,462 · PhilanthropyGreater Salina Community Foundation: $609,000 · PhilanthropyHays Medical Center Foundation: $385,000 · PhilanthropyPLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $299,000 · PhilanthropyWALLANCE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $249,750 · PhilanthropyCOSMOSPHERE INC: $410,000 · Arts & CultureSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP: $285,000 · Arts & CultureMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC: $141,800 · Arts & CultureWESTERN PLAINS ARTS ASSOCIATION: $138,960 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $120,240 · Arts & CultureLovewell Institute for the Creative Arts Inc: $112,800 · Arts & CultureCHEYENNE CENTER FOR CREATIVITY INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCREEDE REPERTORY THEATRE: $90,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureWILSON CZECH OPERA HOUSE CORPORATION: $75,000 · Arts & CultureGROW HAYS INC: $385,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $335,700 · Community ImprovementNORTH CENTRAL KANSAS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $312,500 · Community ImprovementRUSSELL DEVELOPMENT INC: $150,000 · Community ImprovementWESTERN VISTA BUILDING COMPLEX INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCLYDE COMMUNITY HALL INC: $95,000 · Community ImprovementBRINGING IT HOME TO OZ: $60,000 · Community ImprovementWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $283,773 · EducationSALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationHAYS AREA CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $68,278 · EducationKVC HOSPITALS INC: $250,000 · Health
Other$104,487,968Human Services$3,838,940Philanthropy$2,265,212Arts & Culture$1,558,800Community Improvement$1,438,200Education$602,051Health$250,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC: $2,067,210 over 3y, 80% of budgetCITIZENS FOUNDATION: $722,462 over 5y, 49% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $609,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetVICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetNORTON AREA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION: $448,597 over 5y, 51% of budgetCOSMOSPHERE INC: $410,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGROW HAYS INC: $385,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHays Medical Center Foundation: $385,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $380,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KANSAS LEARNING CENTER FOR HEALTH INC: $343,070 over 4y, 26% of budgetGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $335,700 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $330,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC: $319,935 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL KANSAS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $312,500 over 1y, 100% of budgetPLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $299,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP: $285,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $283,773 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKVC HOSPITALS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWALLANCE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $249,750 over 3y, 36% of budgetHIGH POINT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $195,733 over 2y, 12% of budgetSALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $170,532 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetWestern Kansas Child Advocacy Center: $150,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetRUSSELL DEVELOPMENT INC: $150,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC: $141,800 over 4y, 30% of budgetWESTERN PLAINS ARTS ASSOCIATION: $138,960 over 5y, 36% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $120,240 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSunset Home Inc: $116,400 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLovewell Institute for the Creative Arts Inc: $112,800 over 3y, 17% of budgetSMOKY HILL CHILD CARE FOUNDATION: $107,080 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetHOSPICE SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC: $103,060 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWESTERN VISTA BUILDING COMPLEX INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCHEYENNE CENTER FOR CREATIVITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetCLYDE COMMUNITY HALL INC: $95,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetJEWELL COUNTY STRONG INC: $86,500 over 1y, 85% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAYS AREA CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $68,278 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetBRINGING IT HOME TO OZ: $60,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetFORT WALLACE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $59,680 over 3y, 16% of budgetSMITH COUNTY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $58,859 over 2y, 20% of budgetPHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $51,534 over 5y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEX-GENERATION ROUND UP FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTON AREA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Salina Community FoundationKS123.2× affinity69 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation · Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · The Patterson Family Foundation · Robert E and Patricia Schmidt Foundation · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Earl Bane Foundation · Smoot Charitable Foundation · Verla Nesbitt Joscelyn Foundation · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Salina Regional Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dane G Hansen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dane G Hansen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dane G Hansen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dane G Hansen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 554 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dane G Hansen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph