Skip to content

· Community foundation

Dallas Community Foundation

The foundation provides financial support for educational, civic, recreational and cultural activities, programs, institutions, facilities and organizations and those serving youth and promoting the health, safety and general welfare principally of persons residing within the boundaries of the dallas school district.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$141kEducation$90kArts & Culture$44kEnvironment$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kRecreation & Sports$25kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $42,071, the rows itemized in this filing. The $145,054 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,983 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$17,371
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$19,000
FRIENDS OF DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY$17,371
WOU DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Dallas Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 85%.

Dallas Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$254k · 5 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$254k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    POLK COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS & EVENTS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $141k
  • WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $59k · revenue +81%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $24k

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Independence
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • DB
    DALLAS BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -71%
  • PC
    POLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POLK COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS & EVENTS: $140,689 · OtherPOLK COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS & EVENTSCity of Independence: $26,008 · OtherCity of IndependenceDALLAS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $25,000 · OtherDALLAS BOOSTER CLUB INCFRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $23,871 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARYPOLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $23,267 · OtherPOLK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYFRIENDS OF THE DELBERT HUNTER ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN: $21,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE DELBERT HUNTER ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCITY OF DALLAS: $12,349 · Other+4 more: $29,602 · Other+4 moreWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $58,766 · EducationWESTERN OREGON UN…FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$320,786Education$58,766Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $58,766 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetDALLAS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetDALLAS EMERGENCY FOOD CORP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM FREE CLINICS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS EMERGENCY FOOD CORP ↗
  • Who funds SALEM SYMPHONIC WINDS DBA SALEM CONCERT BAND ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FREE CLINICS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Marion-Polk Food Share Inc · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Maps Community Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dallas Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dallas Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Western Oregon University Development Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dallas Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dallas Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dallas’ filings →

More from the funding graph