Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dale H Ballard Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$232kReligion$219kHealth$101kHuman Services$45kYouth Development$14kPublic Benefit$12kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$985k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Church of Jesus Christ of LDS$49,000
Western Wyoming College Foundation$20,000
TPUSA$10,000
Hirsche Smiles Foundation$8,000
Courage Reins$8,000
The Refuge Utah$5,000
Kids on the Move$3,000
Draper Meadows 5th Ward$2,400
Friends for Sight$2,000
CAPSA$2,000
Common Ground Outdoor Adventures$2,000
The Happy Factory$1,000
Wrap the World in Quilts$1,000
Utah Honor Flight$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAPSA: $3k → 12%The Happy Factory: $2k → 13%Common Ground Outdoor Adventures: $3k → 12%The Happy Factory: $1k → 13%CAPSA: $2k → 12%The Happy Factory: $1k → 13%CAPSA: $2k → 12%The Happy Factory: $1k → 13%Common Ground Outdoor Adventures: $2k → 12%The Happy Factory: $1k → 13%CAPSA: $2k → 12%The Happy Factory: $1k → 13%Common Ground Outdoor Adventures: $2k → 12%Common Ground Outdoor Adventures: $1k → 12%Utah Youth Village: $2k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $10k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $10k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $8k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $8k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $8k → 8%Hirsche Smiles Foundation: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$554k · 12 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$554k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+106%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HIRSCHE SMILES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +123%
  • TC
    The Center for Women and Children in Crisis
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +212%
  • CA
    CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • LC
    LDS Church
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • HC
    Huntsman Cancer Institute
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +106%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids Who Count

We empower families to optimize the developmental potential of their young children.

Education
2
Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services
3
Recreation and Habilitation Services (Rah)

Provides services and supports to individuals in Utah County who have intellectual disabilities.

4
Dyslexia Center of Utah New Heights Inc

We inspire and transform students with learning differences into confident, independent, and successful readers. We collaborate with colleagues and members of the community for the welfare and value of our diverse learners.

Education
5
Utah Kids Foundation

To support all special needs families in Utah by: 1. Sharing information about doctors and resources in the community, 2. Facilitating the legal exchange of spare supplies, 3. Providing comfort and support when our special needs children…

Education
6
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
7
Utah Domestic Violence Legal Services

Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.

Crime & Legal
8
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
9
Eastern Utah Early Intervention Inc

The organization's mission is to provide diagnostic and therapy (early intervention) services to infants and toddlers with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

11
Eye Care for Kids - Utah

Eye care 4 kids provides professional eyecare to underserved children and adults.

Health
12
Utah Parent Center Inc

Our mission is to help parents help their children, youth and young adults with all disabilities to live included, productive lives as members of the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis and the most unlike its peers is Western Wyoming College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Western Wyoming Community College — $205,000 · OtherWestern Wyoming Community CollegeThe Church of Jesus Christ of LDS — $179,300 · OtherThe Church of Jesus Christ of LDSLDS Church — $40,000 · OtherLDS Church+8 more — $42,300 · Other+8 moreHIRSCHE SMILES FOUNDATION — $51,000 · Human ServicesHIRSCHE SMILE…CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $9,000 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAI…COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES — $8,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GROUND…HAPPY FACTORY INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY FACTORY…+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesCourage Reins — $38,000 · HealthCourage Rei…The Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $26,000 · HealthThe Center …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $3,000 · HealthWESTERN WYOMING COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationKids on the Move Inc — $7,000 · EducationUTAH HONOR FLIGHT — $7,000 · Public Benefit
Other$466,600Human Services$77,000Health$67,000Education$27,000Public Benefit$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHIRSCHE SMILES FOUNDATION — $51,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetCourage Reins — $38,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN WYOMING COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES — $8,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUTAH HONOR FLIGHT — $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHAPPY FACTORY INC — $7,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetKids on the Move Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH YOUTH VILLAGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR SIGHT — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIRSCHE SMILES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Courage Reins
  • Who funds The Center for Women and Children in Crisis
  • Who funds WESTERN WYOMING COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES
  • Who funds UTAH HONOR FLIGHT
  • Who funds HAPPY FACTORY INC
  • Who funds Kids on the Move Inc
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR SIGHT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation · The Gibney Family Foundation Inc · DME Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · The Miner Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dale H Ballard Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dale H Ballard Jr Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dale H Ballard Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph