Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dalal Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$790k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.0MReligion$443kEducation$369kHuman Services$199kEnvironment$141kInternational$62kYouth Development$25kAnimals$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $790k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA$789,962
THE WARDLAW HARTRIDGE SCHOOL$100,000
VARIOUS OTHER SMALL DONATIONS$27,340
IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS$25,000
MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION$20,000
GOTR OF CENTRAL NJ INC$20,000
PRATHAM USA$20,000
AYATI CHARITY$16,000
SKN FOUNDATION$15,000
FIT FOUNDATION$15,000
BONNIE BRAE$10,000
HEART & HAND FOR HANDICAPPED$10,000
SPTS$10,000
PETS FOR VETS INC$10,000
PNR USA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 80% of grant dollars ($2.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($542k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BONNIE BRAE: $10k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 8%BONNIE BRAE: $5k → 8%THE ARC MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 20% of all-years giving ($542k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$542k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
26

Total granted

$1.1M
$758k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+42%

Still filing today

48%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $877k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +44%
  • MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +547%
  • MS
    MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • SB
    SHREE BORIVALI GUJARATI SEVA MANDAL
    one grant, 2021 · $400k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • MC
    MIDDLESEX COUNTY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Swami Dayanand Education Foundation
Education
3
Vidya Girls Education Foundation
Education
4
Pardada Pardadi Educational Society Inc

PPES USAs Mission is to further the education of young women. It does so by supporting Pardada Pardadi Educational Society India PPES India a school for girls in uttar pradesh India.

Education
5
Sadvidya Foundation

Education

Religion
6
Vidya Vikas Charitable Trust Inc

Contribute towards education in rural india

International
7
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
8
Vidyadhara Foundation

Provide no cost education or facilitate by lending funds to other non profits and deserving students,teachers and schools in underserved communities to underserved and remote villages and locations where Governments cannot offer tuition or…

Education
9
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
10
Arya Pragati Usa

The purpose of Arya Pragati USA is to provide financial support to capable financially underprivileged students in India to complete their studies. These studies can be for Undergraduate, Post-Graduate, preparation for competitive exams or…

Human Services
11
Akhand Jyoti Usa

Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india

Health
12
The Shaare Dina Charitable Trust
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muni Seva Charitable Foundation Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $789,962 · OtherSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USASHREE BORIVALI GUJARATI SEVA MANDAL: $400,403 · OtherSHREE BORIVALI GUJARATI SEVA MANDALIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPNR SOCIETY: $141,262 · OtherPNR SOCIETYCHINMAYA MISSION TRI-STATE CENTER: $121,000 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION TRI-STATE CENTER+36 more: $454,422 · Other+36 moreTHE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL: $136,000 · EducationTHE WARDLAW…MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · EducationMIDDLESEX C…SOUTH PLAINFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $48,000 · EducationSOUTH PLAIN…+2 more: $12,000 · EducationAYATI: $51,000 · HealthIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $25,000 · HealthPILLAR CARE CONTINUUM: $24,325 · HealthMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $60,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $33,250 · International+1 more: $1,250 · InternationalPNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesBONNIE BRAE: $15,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesPets for Vets Inc: $20,000 · Public BenefitPRATHAM USA: $12,500 · PhilanthropySPREAD THE JOY INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,157,049Education$281,000Health$100,325International$94,500Human Services$71,500Public Benefit$20,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL: $136,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetHEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD: $66,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetPNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetAYATI: $51,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetSOUTH PLAINFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $33,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPILLAR CARE CONTINUUM: $24,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPets for Vets Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBONNIE BRAE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISHA FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYUVA PRAGATI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSPREAD THE JOY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVIVEKANANDA VIDYAPITH INC: $1,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAGIC BUS USA: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD ↗
  • Who funds MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PNR USA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AYATI ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS ↗
  • Who funds PILLAR CARE CONTINUUM ↗
  • Who funds Pets for Vets Inc ↗
  • Who funds BONNIE BRAE ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YUVA PRAGATI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ18.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Columbia Bank Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · American Express Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dalal Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dalal Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Bonnie Brae: 3% of income from government
  • Pillar Care Continuum: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dalal Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dalal Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dalal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph