Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daisys Sunshine Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$27kAnimals$16kEducation$13kCrime & Legal$7kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$2kReligion$700
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$739k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pleasant Hills Children's Home$13,500
Full Armor Christian Academy$8,000
Rusk County Pets Alive$5,380
Hiway 80 Rescue Mission$5,000
Son Shine Lighthouse Ministries$4,000
The Martin House Children's Advocac$2,500
St Jude Children's Hospital$1,000
Community Enrichment Centers$1,000
Wounded Warrior Project$1,000
OnRamp Inc$1,000
Calvary Baptist Church$700
Rusk County Child Welfare Board$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Community Enrichment Centers: $1k → 11%OnRamp Inc: $1k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 14%OnRamp Inc: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of Daisys Sunshine Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Daisys Sunshine Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 5 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$39k
$9k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H8
    HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +38%
  • OI
    OnRamp Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Church of the Living Word Outreach Ministry Inc

To seek and save those who are lost....to go into the world and to equip men and women to become productive citizens...and to be able to give back into the society.

Religion
2
Christ's Community Church

Strentgthen families and empower communities

Religion
3
Robeson Family Counseling Center Inc

Outpatient christian counseling

—
4
Animal Rescue Crusaders of Texas

Rescuing Cats and Dogs

Animals
5
Jesus Christ Prison Mininstry

To provide an intense bibically based training program to transform once hardened criminals into positive, productive members od the community

Religion
6
Recovery Point Ministry

Womens recovery center in arkansas

Human Services
7
Hoffman Prison Ministry Inc

Christian ministry

Human Services
8
Hope for All in Jesus Prison Outreach

Christian church services in the prison system

—
9
Rescue and Revive Ministries Inc

Rescuing the lost and reviving the saved with the everlasting gospel of jesus christ.

Religion
10
Wilderness Refuge Recovery Ministries

Transitional home

Health
11
Angels Healing and Recovery Church
Religion
12
Jesus Is the Way Prison Ministry in

We travel to prisons and preach the gospel of jesus christ to inmates. upon their release, we help prisoners with housing, food, clothing, spiritual guidance and counseling, drug and alcohol rehab, job skills training and job placement,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abilene Christian University; the most unlike its peers is OnRamp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pleasant Hills Children's Home: $19,000 · OtherPleasant Hills Children's HomeFULL ARMOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $8,000 · OtherFULL ARMOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMYHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION: $5,500 · OtherHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Martin House Children's Advocac: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $700 · OtherRUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE: $11,380 · AnimalsRUSK COUNTY PETS A…OnRamp Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesRUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC: $500 · Human ServicesSON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$49,700Animals$11,380Human Services$4,500Housing & Shelter$4,000Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE: $11,380 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetFULL ARMOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOnRamp Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daisys Sunshine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daisys Sunshine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daisys Sunshine Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Daisys Sunshine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daisys Sunshine’s filings →

More from the funding graph