How much did DAIRY PROMOTION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of DAIRY PROMOTION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

healthmemberseducatescience-baseddevelopeffectiveproducers

2019

healthmemberseducatescience-baseddevelopeffective

2020

healthscience-basededucatedevelopeffective

2021

commonwealtheducatescience-basedhealthdevelopeffective

2022

commonwealth

2023

commonwealth

2024

commonwealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k3 grants · $108k
$50k–250k6 grants · $708k
$250k+19 grants · $73M

$1,037,700

Median grant

States reached

$569k

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIONAL DAIRY BOARD$27,562,708
DAIRY MAX$15,838,857
EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORP$6,296,617
MICHIGAN DAIRY MARKET PROGRAM$4,076,328
WISCONSIN MILK MARKETING BOARD$3,235,310
IDAHO DAIRY PRODUCTS COMMISSION$2,412,858
ADADC COLUMBUS (MIDEAST)$1,622,125
VERMONT DAIRY PROMO COUNCIL$1,523,608
MIDWEST DAIRY ASSOCIATION$1,491,921
ADADC SYRACUSE (INC)$1,401,325
SE UNITED DAIRY INDUSTRY ASSOC$1,150,563
UTAH DAIRY COMMISSION$1,139,807
ADA INDIANA$1,110,872
DAIRY FARMERS INC$1,037,700
NEBRASKA DAIRY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT$806,429

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$581M · 50 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$581M

$85k

Still filing today

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Food & NutritionScience & TechEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ND
NATIONAL DAIRY BOARD
5× · 2017–2021 · $134M · revenue +142%
DM
DAIRY MAX
8× · 2017–2024 · $120M · revenue +61% · 76% of their budget
WM
WISCONSIN MILK MARKETING BOARD
8× · 2017–2024 · $29M · revenue +9%

Funded once

CO
COMMONWEALTH OF MA
one grant, 2021 · $85k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Wisconsin Dairy Products Association Inc

Statewide trade association representing the interests of the dairy processing industry through advocacy and education

—

American Dairy Science Association Inc

The american dairy science association promotes the creation, dissemination, and exchange of scientific and technical knowledge to improve and sustain the global dairy sector, to the benefit of humankind.

—

Maine Dairy Promotion Board

The Maine Dairy Promotion Board is a non-profit, USDA qualified, dairy checkoff organization. Maine Dairy Promotion Board operates on behalf of the US and Maine dairyu farmers to drive increase sales and demand.

—

Southside Dairy Association

—

American Dairy Assn of Michigan Inc

To promote the dairy industry in cooperation with other states and organizations.

—

National Dairy Cattle Congress

Promoting agriculture.

—

Oregon Dairy Women

Promote dairy industry through the dissemination of authentic information; promote better producer, processor, consumer relations; promote greater use of dairy foods through educational programs

Recreation & Sports

Professional Dairy Producers of

To promote the dairy profession with efficient and profitable business and management practices, improve the quality of life for its members now and in the future, and to foster a positive image for the dairy profession.

—

Global Dairy Platform Inc

To align and support the international dairy industry to promote sustainable dairy nutrition.

Community Improvement

Dairy Management Inc

To invest dairy producer checkoff funds in strategic, coordinated marketing programs designated to increase consumption of dairy products both domestically and internationally.

—

Wisconsin State Fair Dairy Promotion Fund Inc

Promote and educate the public regarding agriculture in the state of wisconsin

—

Dairy Council of Michigan Inc

To promote health and welfare by educating the public regarding the benefits of dairy products.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is Michigan Dairy Foods Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/48

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,517

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/23

Grantees still filing

13/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$427,900,402Food & Nutrition$138,337,335Science & Tech$10,778,364Education$2,449,162Arts & Culture$1,432,977

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DAIRY PROMOTION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NEBRASKA DAIRY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237315360 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NEBRASKA DAIRY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 89% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dairy Promotion Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dairy Promotion Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DAIRY PROMOTION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dairy Promotion Inc?

More from the funding graph

DAIRY PROMOTION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dairy Promotion Inc?

More from the funding graph