Skip to content

· Private foundation

D F Dillon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
112
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$25MArts & Culture$4.5MHealth$4.1MReligion$3.5MHuman Services$2.7MRecreation & Sports$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.1MCommunity Improvement$975kOther$0
02FY2025 · 112 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.0M
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,000,000
DOANE COLLEGE$500,000
PIUS X FOUNDATION$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$500,000
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$475,000
REGIS UNIVERSITY$300,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
CATO INSTITUTE$250,000
LINCOLN CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$250,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$215,000
NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$200,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$200,000
BLESSED SACRAMENT SCHOOL$176,000
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$175,000
BELLEVUE UNIVERSITY$175,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $965k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $10k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $20k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $10k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDRENS HOME: $30k → 13%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDRENS HOME: $30k → 13%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDRENS HOME: $20k → 13%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $50k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $50k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $25k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $25k → 12%OMAHA HONE FOR BOYS: $15k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $25k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $15k → 12%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF LINCO: $85k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $20k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $20k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $15k → 13%CULTURAL CENTERS OF LINCOLN: $200k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46M · 142 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

142 repeat relationships: 99 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

142
49

Total granted

$46M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+1%

Still filing today

51%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.7M · revenue +70%
  • RU
    REGIS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +5%
  • DU
    DOANE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • LC
    LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +73%
  • NP
    NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue -11%
  • CC
    CULTURAL CENTERS OF LINCOLN
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
2
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
3
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
4
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
5
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
6
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
7
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
8
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
9
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
10
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
11
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
12
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civic Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Celebrating Nebraska Statehood Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/100
Grantees still filing
66/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL FOUNDATIO: $1,671,215 · OtherNEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL FOUNDATIOBLESSED SACRAMENT SCHOOL: $1,131,500 · OtherST TERESA'S SCHOOL: $969,152 · OtherRONCALLI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $945,000 · OtherPIUS X FOUNDATION: $920,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDAT: $850,000 · Other+135 more: $17,325,921 · Other+135 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $9,650,450 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONREGIS UNIVERSITY: $1,700,000 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITYDOANE UNIVERSITY: $1,650,000 · EducationDOANE UNIVERSITYCreighton University: $1,197,367 · EducationCreighton UniversityNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $900,000 · EducationNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYBellevue University: $795,000 · Education+7 more: $981,500 · Education+7 moreBryan Foundation: $600,000 · HealthCENTERPOINTE INC: $565,500 · HealthSAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $385,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $335,000 · HealthHOPESPOKE: $335,000 · HealthANGELS AMONG US: $280,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NEBRASKA: $210,000 · HealthThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $200,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Health+4 more: $199,170 · HealthColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $520,000 · Arts & CultureNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $185,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $115,700 · Arts & CultureMOURNING HOPE: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCELEBRATING NEBRASKA STATEHOOD INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE ARTS CENTER INC: $81,500 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $70,000 · Arts & CulturePOST PLAYHOUSE: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $186,250 · Arts & CultureFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $485,000 · Human ServicesCULTURAL CENTERS OF LINCOLN: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $165,000 · Human ServicesCASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $145,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF LINCOLN: $85,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDREN'S HOME: $80,000 · Human Services+2 more: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATO INSTITUTE: $840,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $20,000 · Public BenefitFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $775,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $12,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$23,812,788Education$16,874,317Health$3,219,670Arts & Culture$1,618,450Human Services$1,450,000Public Benefit$1,070,000Food & Nutrition$787,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $9,650,450 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $1,700,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDOANE UNIVERSITY: $1,650,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCreighton University: $1,197,367 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $900,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $840,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBellevue University: $795,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $775,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBryan Foundation: $600,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $575,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $575,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetCENTERPOINTE INC: $565,500 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetST AGNES ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $542,332 over 9y, 54% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $520,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $485,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $450,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $385,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetTabitha Inc: $345,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $335,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHOPESPOKE: $335,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $300,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetEASTMONT TOWERS FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $280,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $270,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $213,500 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF NEBRASKA: $210,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION: $186,500 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $185,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $165,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $145,000 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $140,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $130,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA TRAILS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetLINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $120,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetLINCOLN COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $115,700 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetKNIGHTS OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST INC: $110,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $108,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetMILKWORKS INC: $103,170 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetWAYNE STATE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $100,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DOANE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Bellevue University ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTERPOINTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST AGNES ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tabitha Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPESPOKE ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EASTMONT TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE103.3× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Abel Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Cooper Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · The Lozier Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D F Dillon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D F Dillon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to D F Dillon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to D F Dillon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 200 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D F Dillon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph