How much does D&P Roberts Family Foundation give?

D&P Roberts Family Foundation reported 23 grants totaling $120,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 41 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does D&P Roberts Family Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (19%), Human Services (12%), Education (11%).

Who are D&P Roberts Family Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Silver Creek Alliance Inc ($55k), Chelan Valley Housing Trust ($50k), Henrys Fork Foundation Inc ($49k).

Does D&P Roberts Family Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does D&P Roberts Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as D&P Roberts Family Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Puget Sound Energy Foundation, Seattle Foundation, Apex Foundation.

Where is D&P Roberts Family Foundation based?

D&P Roberts Family Foundation is based in DE.

D&P Roberts Family Foundation

D&P Roberts Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

D&P Roberts Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$20k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$162kHuman Services$102kEducation$92kArts & Culture$76kHousing & Shelter$75kInternational$63kAnimals$41kYouth Development$39kOther$0

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k19 grants · $69k
$10k–50k4 grants · $52k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.7M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC	$20,000
WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COMPANY	$11,500
WATER FOR PEOPLE	$10,000
THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES	$10,000
SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC	$9,500
IDAHO BASECAMP	$7,500
SUN VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL	$6,000
THE RESCUE MISSION	$5,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC	$5,000
ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY	$5,000
SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP	$5,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST E M M	$3,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED	$3,000
PROJECT BIG WOOD A NONPROFIT CORPORATION	$2,500
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS	$2,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$763k · 46 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$763k

$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+29%

Still filing today

91%

84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +61%
CV
CHELAN VALLEY HOUSING TRUST
5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +101%
HF
HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC
7× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +160%

Funded once

MP
Magnuson Park Center for Excellence dba Hangar2
one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -100%
OH
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +61%
WM
WOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVEgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +121%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—

Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy

School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development

Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—

American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit

Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—

Willamette Riverkeeper

Willamette riverkeeper's guiding principle is: "we believe a river with excellent water quality, abundant natural habitat, safe for fishing and recreation is a basic public right." for 27 years, willamette riverkeeper (wrk) has acted as…

Environment

Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit

Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment

Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development

Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overlake Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Passtopassorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

73/73

Grantees still filing

53/73

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$333,125Human Services$130,625Education$90,500Philanthropy$78,000International$71,000Housing & Shelter$69,500Arts & Culture$65,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE33.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Apex Foundation · United Way of King County · Grousemont Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Lucky Seven Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D&P Roberts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D&P Roberts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to D&P Roberts Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to D&P Roberts Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on D&P Roberts Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home