· Private foundation
D&P Roberts Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST COMPANY | $11,500 |
| WATER FOR PEOPLE | $10,000 |
| THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | $10,000 |
| SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC | $9,500 |
| IDAHO BASECAMP | $7,500 |
| SUN VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL | $6,000 |
| ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY | $5,000 |
| SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP | $5,000 |
| THE RESCUE MISSION | $5,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $5,000 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST E M M | $3,000 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED | $3,000 |
| PROJECT BIG WOOD A NONPROFIT CORPORATION | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +61%
- CVCHELAN VALLEY HOUSING TRUST5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +101%
- HFHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- OHOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +61%
- WMWOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +121%
- MPMagnuson Park Center for Excellence dba Hangar2one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.
Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
Willamette riverkeeper's guiding principle is: "we believe a river with excellent water quality, abundant natural habitat, safe for fishing and recreation is a basic public right." for 27 years, willamette riverkeeper (wrk) has acted as…
To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.
Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overlake Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Passtopassorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CHELAN VALLEY HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds IDAHO BASE CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL O ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESIDE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HARRIMAN STATE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
- Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WANA DUMA CHILDRENS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Apex Foundation · United Way of King County · Grousemont Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Lucky Seven Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization D&P Roberts Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to D&P Roberts Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to D&P Roberts Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.