Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cy Twombly Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$45MPublic Safety & Disaster$417kCrime & Legal$250kHealth$120k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $201k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.8M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,800,000
DRAWING CENTER INC$100,000
FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC$50,500
SAFE HORIZON INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 9 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$34M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+67%

Still filing today

89%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2020–2021 · $17M · revenue +14%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12M · revenue +12%
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON
    one grant, 2023 · $11M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $417k
  • United States Artists Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc

The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…

Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
6
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
7
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
8
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
9
The Studio Museum in Harlem

The studio museum in harlem is a contemporary art museum that focuses on the work of artists of african descent - as well as work that has been inspired and influenced by african culture - past and present; through its exhibitions,…

Arts & Culture
10
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
11
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
12
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe Horizon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $17,000,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART+5 more: $1,803,100 · Arts & Culture+5 moreMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON: $11,000,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTONFONDAZIONE NICOLA DEL ROSCIO: $720,000 · OtherFONDAZIONE NICOLA DEL ROSCIOIndividual grant recipient: $417,105 · Other+2 more: $169,560 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $11,550,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOSAFE HORIZON INC: $250,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$21,803,100Other$12,306,665Education$11,550,000Human Services$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $17,000,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $11,550,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSWISS INSTITUTE: $500,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $476,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC: $300,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $277,100 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds SWISS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DRAWING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cy Twombly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cy Twombly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cy Twombly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph