Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cy Miller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$91kYouth Development$55kEducation$51kArts & Culture$21kAnimals$10kCivil Rights$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GROWING PLACE$6,500
CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER$6,500
KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA$5,000
ADVENTURE WORKS Of DEKALB$5,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$3,500
ELLWOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION$3,100
TAILS HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $8k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $7k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $6k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 13%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 13%CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$241k
$4k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GROWING PLACE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +26%
  • CL
    CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +6%
  • KF
    KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • KS
    KISHHEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
2
Dekalb Center for Early Learning

At dcel, we believe in the uniqueness of each child. our childcare experience promotes the social, physical, emotional and spiritual growth of each child in a safe and developmentally appropriate environment. children are given…

—
3
Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

—
4
Delta Economic Development Corportation

DEDC was created to assist in the development of programs & projects that address specific needs and contribute to improving East St. Louis.

Human Services
5
Cooperative Nursery School of First Church of Lombard

The Co-Op Preschool provides early childhood educational programs in Lombard, IL. We serve local families with high-quality programming for children from 15 months to 5 years old. The Co-Op Preschool helps children build the skills they…

Education
6
Smart Love Parenting Center

To provide a variety of programs in the chicago area to help children, parents, and adults achieve greater inner well-being, sustain closer relationships, and have more pleasurable family, school, and work lives.

Human Services
7
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services
8
Little Thinkers Inc

Our mission is to prepare the children of our community for the road ahead. We take a whole-child approach that blends personalized care plans with physical play, social development, and academic readiness.

Human Services
9
Fergus Falls Community Child Care Center Inc

Children's corner is a full day child care center that gives each child a warm environment that encourages the development of socialization skills, independence, and a positive self-image.

Human Services
10
Hyde Park Neighborhood Club

To help families and schools to develop healthy, well-rounded young people by providing enriching activities, leadership models, a place of pride and sense of commmunity.

Human Services
11
Lifesteps Inc

Helping individuals and families with life's changing needs by providing programs and services which will improve their quality of life.

Education
12
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adventure Works of Dekalb County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kishwaukee Family Ymca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER INC: $51,460 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER INCKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $34,600 · Human ServicesKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCATHE GROWING PLACE INC: $52,800 · OtherTHE GROWING PLACE INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEKALB COUNTY YOUTH SVCS BUREAU INC: $8,000 · OtherDEKALB COUNTY YOUTH SVCS BUREAU INCFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $4,000 · OtherCONSUMER ADVOCACY COUNCIL OF DEKALB CO: $3,500 · Other+2 more: $3,500 · OtherTHREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHREE FIRES COUNCIL I…ADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentADVENTURE WORKS OF DE…ELLWOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $20,850 · Arts & CultureELLWOOD H…TAILS HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,500 · Animals
Human Services$86,060Other$81,300Youth Development$47,000Arts & Culture$20,850Animals$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GROWING PLACE INC: $52,800 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER INC: $51,460 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $34,600 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127: $27,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetELLWOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $20,850 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $19,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTAILS HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GROWING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds THREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127 ↗
  • Who funds ELLWOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE WORKS OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TAILS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dekalb County Community FoundationIL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dekalb County Community Foundation · Ideal Industries Foundation · Kishwaukee United Way · Horizons Unlimited Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cy Miller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cy Miller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cy Miller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph