Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc

The organization's mission is to organize and participate in fund raising activities to support local charitable organizations.

$60k
Granted FY2019
3
Itemized grants FY2019
3
Organizations funded FY2019
33%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$32k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$12,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$12,500
Organizations funded a year
3 to 4
FY2018 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$85k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 33% of the organizations Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 22% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20193$32k33%
FY20184$45kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Food & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$8kHousing & Shelter$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Junior League of the Woodlands IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Junior League of the Woodlands Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc

How much does Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc give?
Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $32,000, out of $60,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 4 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2019.
What does Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2019, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (45%), Human Services (36%), Youth Development (10%).
Who are Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2019: Montgomery County Womens Center ($28k), Montgomery County Food Bank Inc ($25k), Meals on Wheels Montgomery County ($10k).
Does Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Junior League of the Woodlands Inc, Shell USA Company Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc based?
Cut-N-Shoot Charities Inc is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cut-N-Shoot Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph