Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Curtis Finlay Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$740k
Granted FY2024still arriving
100
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$1.9MFood & Nutrition$302kAnimals$202kArts & Culture$195kHuman Services$192kCrime & Legal$160kRecreation & Sports$122kReligion$122kOther$0
02FY2024 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k80 grants · $397k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $267k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION$76,992
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF BREWTON$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
POLLARD METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
ESCAMBIA COUNTY AL DRUG COURT$20,000
BREWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$20,000
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$16,505
WS NEAL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
JAY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ST PETER BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
TR MILLER HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
UNITED FUND OF BREWTON & EAST BREWTON$10,000
WILMER HALL CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MY FATHER'S ARROWS INC: $6k → 9%MY FATHER'S ARROWS: $6k → 9%MY FATHER'S ARROWS: $5k → 9%MY FATHER'S ARROWS: $5k → 9%MY FATHER'S ARROWS: $5k → 9%ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 21%ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 21%ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 21%ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 21%ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Curtis Finlay Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in AL; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Curtis Finlay Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 136 repeat orgs$511k to everyone else

136 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

136
50

Total granted

$3.4M
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+75%

Still filing today

4%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY BENEVOLENT FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • MF
    MY FATHERS ARROW INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • FM
    FIRST METHODIST CHURCH - BREWTON
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • BC
    BREWTON COUNCIL OF THE ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +75% · 35% of their budget
  • EC
    ESCAMBIA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Mississippi Animal Rescue

Rescue unwanted dogs

Animals
2
Clay County Animal Rescue and Shelter

Animal Control and Adoption Services

Animals
3
Tails From Alabama

Rescue Dogs from Alabama

Animals
4
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
5
Twiggs County Animal Rescue

Save animals in a county with no animal services

Animals
6
Batesville Community Fire Association Inc

Provide fire protection services

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
8
Eolia Community Fire Department Inc

Fire protection

9
East Roane County Volunteer Fire Dept

The department provides volunteer fire and EMS service to approximately 3800 residents (and those passing through on I-40) in East Roane County Tennessee.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Campbell County Rural Fire Svcs Inc

Provides fire protection services for rural homes and businesses in campbell county, tn. assists with forest fires and rescue operations in east tennessee.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Cry for Help Rescue

CFHR brings in dogs and cats from owner surrender or shelters. We foster the animals, give them needed vet treatment then find them suitable homes.

Animals
12
Waccamaw Animal Rescue Mission

Care and placement of abandoned animals

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Fund of Brewton and East Bre and the most unlike its peers is Brewton Council of the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BREWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $195,000 · OtherBREWTON PUBLIC LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient — $145,000 · OtherST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $120,000 · Other+191 more — $3,043,805 · Other+191 moreALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $151,992 · AnimalsPaws Crossed Dog Rescue Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY BENEVOLENT FUND — $50,000 · Human ServicesMY FATHERS ARROW INC — $27,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FUND OF BREWTON AND EAST BRE — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,503,805Animals$171,992Human Services$127,000Community Improvement$50,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $151,992 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $50,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetUNITED FUND OF BREWTON AND EAST BRE — $50,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY BENEVOLENT FUND — $50,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetMY FATHERS ARROW INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPaws Crossed Dog Rescue Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetBREWTON COUNCIL OF THE ARTS — $20,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetESCAMBIA COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE SQUAD — $10,000 over 1y, 33% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
  • Who funds ESCAMBIA COUNTY REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED FUND OF BREWTON AND EAST BRE
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY BENEVOLENT FUND
  • Who funds MY FATHERS ARROW INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First National Bank Charitable FoundationMS15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First National Bank Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Curtis Finlay Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Curtis Finlay Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Curtis Finlay Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 212 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph