Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cure Jm Foundation

To find better treatments and a cure for juvenile myositis and improve the lives of families.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$4.2MEducation$1.5MEnvironment$45k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $1,054,866 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,123,530 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,664 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $879k
$12,440
Median grant
15
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY$210,629
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$170,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$128,797
UNIV CALIFORNIA SF BENIOFF CHILDRE$125,000
BINGHAMTON UNIV STATE OF NEW YORK$112,500
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$70,000
SEATTLE CHILDEREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDA$62,500
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAG$47,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH$16,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO$12,440
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS DEPARTMENT OF MEDICIN$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNT$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTAEMO$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPIT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $113k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNT: $10k → 10%RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO: $12k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%BINGHAMTON UNIV STATE OF NEW YORK: $113k → 20%MONTEFIORE: $10k → 28%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN: $74k → 14%GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON MYOSITIS INC: $12k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $38k → 11%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $263k → 17%NATL INSTITUTE OF ENVIR HEALTH SCIE: $25k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTAEMO: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF COLORADO: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $30k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAG: $193k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $165k → 4%NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING: $100k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPIT: $10k → 19%BINGHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $38k → 20%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $211k → 14%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $142k → 17%NATL INSTITUTE OF ENVIR HEALTH SCIE: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S: $188k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $143k → 4%NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING: $75k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS DEPARTMENT OF MEDICIN: $10k → 19%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $134k → 17%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S: $150k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $113k → 4%NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: $16k → 8%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $73k → 17%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S: $88k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 4%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $63k → 17%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAG: $47k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $95k → 4%CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY: $48k → 17%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $70k → 4%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $170k → 17%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $68k → 4%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $63k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $33k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $162k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$162k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 11 repeat orgs$970k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$4.8M
$604k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+21%

Still filing today

82%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $366k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $828k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $788k · revenue +43%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $753k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2024 · $142k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2023 · $124k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $113k · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
5
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
6
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

7
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
8
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

9
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
10
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
11
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
12
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital & Research Cntr Fndn and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 66 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%67%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%67%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $933,026 · HealthCHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH ALLIANCESEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $787,821 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $664,501 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $125,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $113,234 · Health+13 more — $202,378 · Health+13 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $827,875 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYThe George Washington University — $752,500 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $265,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCUniversity of San Francisco — $223,250 · EducationUniversity of San FranciscoFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $112,500 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine — $87,500 · Education+2 more — $47,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $141,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $123,750 · OtherMRC AT HARWELL INSTITUTE — $45,399 · OtherNATL INSTITUTE OF ENVIR HEALTH SCIE — $45,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $40,000 · OtherSUNY Binghamton — $37,500 · Other+2 more — $21,581 · OtherResearch Triangle Institute — $175,000 · Science & Tech
Health$2,825,960Education$2,316,125Other$454,730Science & Tech$175,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDHOOD ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $933,026 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $827,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $787,821 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $752,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $664,501 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $265,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $223,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute — $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $113,234 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $112,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $87,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL REHABILITATION AND SPECIALIZED CARE — $73,938 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO — $12,440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cure Jm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph