Skip to content

· Public charity

Cure Childhood Cancer Inc

To advance treatments and ultimately find cures for cancers which affect children, working to ensure children have the best chance to survive their cancer without sacrificing their future health and quality of life, to support the hands-on education and training of the best and brightest minds dedicated to extinguishing childhood cancer…

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$2.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$37MEducation$330k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $660k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.8M
$330,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation Inc$2,865,663
University of Colorado Denver$330,000
University fo Alabama at Birmingham$330,000
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio$330,000
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai$330,000
University of Pennsylvania$330,000
University of Wisconsin$330,000
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center$220,000
Purdue University$220,000
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute$220,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON: $330k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $330k → 11%AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS CENTER: $676k → 22%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $330k → 8%University of California San Francisco: $880k → 10%BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $330k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $250k → 17%University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio: $330k → 16%The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: $660k → 16%Georgetown University: $330k → 14%University fo Alabama at Birmingham: $330k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $165k → 21%University of Wisconsin: $330k → 10%AFLAC CANCER CENTER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA EMORY UNIVERSITY: $2.8M → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION INC: $3.0M → 14%University of Colorado Denver: $330k → 10%Purdue University: $220k → 19%RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $220k → 17%THE BEN TOWNE CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH: $261k → 9%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CLEVELAND: $220k → 14%VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION: $152k → 21%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $303k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $494k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $165k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE TEXAS CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER: $332k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $330k → 16%Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation Inc: $2.9M → 14%RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $165k → 17%Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center: $550k → 9%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $330k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION: $378k → 22%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $330k → 17%The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: $220k → 16%Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation Inc: $2.4M → 14%Case Western Reserve University: $330k → 17%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $350k → 9%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $220k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $330k → 22%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $330k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE TEXAS CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER: $206k → 16%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION INC: $2.2M → 14%The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $330k → 22%AFLAC CANCER CENTER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA EMORY UNIVERSITY: $2.9M → 14%THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION: $200k → 22%AFLAC CANCER CENTER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA EMORY UNIVERSITY: $2.7M → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $190k → 22%AFLAC CANCER CENTER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.8M → 14%AFLAC CANCER CENTER CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.7M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 14 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$30M
$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+15%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $880k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2017–2025 · $853k · revenue +162%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2017–2024 · $690k · revenue +88%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    2× · 2023–2025 · $660k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2024 · $880k
  • FH
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    one grant, 2024 · $550k · revenue +25%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $494k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
8
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
9
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $11,873,038 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $853,129 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $690,020 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $632,465 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $590,820 · Health+9 more: $2,812,261 · Health+9 moreCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $11,201,445 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $880,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON: $880,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM HEERSINK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $660,000 · Other+10 more: $2,903,374 · Other+10 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $660,000 · EducationICAHN SCH…Baylor College of Medicine: $538,391 · EducationBaylor Co…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $330,000 · EducationCASE WEST…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $330,000 · EducationTRUSTEES …GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $330,000 · EducationGEORGETOW…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationTHE BOARD…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $165,000 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $151,605 · EducationAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $150,000 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $139,978 · Education
Health$17,451,733Other$16,524,819Education$3,094,974

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $11,873,038 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $853,129 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $690,020 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $660,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $632,465 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $590,820 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $550,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $538,391 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $493,518 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $399,343 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW BABIES & CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $385,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $350,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $330,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $330,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $330,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $330,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $330,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $220,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $212,392 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $165,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $151,605 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $139,978 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation: $84,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cure Childhood Cancer Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cure Childhood Cancer Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cure Childhood Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph