Skip to content

· Private foundation

CTW Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$489kArts & Culture$88kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$34kCommunity Improvement$32kYouth Development$25kHealth$15kEnvironment$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Amsterdam High School$18,000
Amsterdam Free Library$12,000
Montgomery County Literacy Project Inc$10,000
Fort Plain Library$8,000
Sanford Home for Women$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Canajoharie Library$5,000
Creative Connections Art Center$5,000
Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc$5,000
Grow Amsterdam$5,000
Walter Elwood Museum$4,000
The Frothingham Free Library$3,670
Canajoharie Central School$3,000
Oppenheim-Ephratah St Johnsville HS$3,000
Fort Plain Central School$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $5k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $3k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $3k → 14%Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$787k · 25 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +190% since the first grant, against +107% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$787k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+190%
+107%

Still filing today

32%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMSTERDAM FREE LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +269%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +42%
  • WE
    WALTER ELWOOD MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CH
    Community Health Center
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +107%
  • MT
    Mountains to Miracles Veteran Found
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Julia L Butterfield Memorial Library

Public library

Education
2
Stone Memorial Library

Serves as a public library

—
3
Cumberland County Historical Society

Historical library & museums

Arts & Culture
4
Hazard Library Association

Public library

—
5
North Smithfield Public Library

Public library providing access to a wide variety of materials and services to the community

Education
6
Cochranton Area Public Library

Serves as a public library.

—
7
Berlin Free Town Library

To provide materials and programming for the recreational and educational needs of the community.

—
8
Parkesburg Free Library

The mission of the Parkesburg Free Library is to provide the Parkesburg Borough and surrounding communities with book materials and information necessary for personal growth and life long learning. We seek to guide community and business…

—
9
Petersham Memorial Library

To provide free reading and edueducation material to the general public

Education
10
Harris Memorial Library

Library chartered to serve the town of otego (3,115)

—
11
Berlin Free Library Association

Public free library

Education
12
William B Ogden Free Library

To provide library services to local area residents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery County Office for Aging Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fort Hunter Free Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMSTERDAM FREE LIBRARY: $88,100 · OtherAMSTERDAM FREE LIBRARYAmsterdam High School: $84,000 · OtherAmsterdam High SchoolMONTGOMERY COUNTY LITERACY PROJECT INC: $71,200 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY LITERACY PROJECT INCIndividual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOppenheim-Ephratah St Johnsville HS: $39,000 · OtherOppenheim-Ephratah St Johnsville HSFort Plain Central School: $39,000 · OtherFort Plain Central SchoolFondaFultonville High School: $39,000 · OtherFondaFultonville High SchoolCanajoharie Central School: $39,000 · OtherCanajoharie Central SchoolCreative Connections Art Center: $37,000 · OtherCatholic Charities Food Pantry: $34,000 · OtherCentro Civico of Amsterdam: $31,700 · OtherCanajoharie Library: $30,700 · OtherFort Plain Library: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $24,550 · Other+12 more: $82,670 · Other+12 moreMONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC: $37,500 · Human ServicesWALTER ELWOOD MUSEUM: $27,500 · Arts & CultureMONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFORT HUNTER FREE LIBRARY: $11,500 · EducationHAVEN OF HOPE FARM AND RESIDENCE INC: $8,900 · Housing & Shelter
Other$708,920Human Services$37,500Arts & Culture$29,500Education$11,500Housing & Shelter$8,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMSTERDAM FREE LIBRARY: $88,100 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC: $37,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWALTER ELWOOD MUSEUM: $27,500 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $24,550 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetFROTHINGHAM FREE LIBRARY: $18,670 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetFORT HUNTER FREE LIBRARY: $11,500 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE FARM AND RESIDENCE INC: $8,900 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMSTERDAM FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTER ELWOOD MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FROTHINGHAM FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FORT HUNTER FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE FARM AND RESIDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DIMENSIONS IN LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CTW Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CTW Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to CTW Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to CTW Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on CTW’s filings →

    More from the funding graph