Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc

The mission of connecticut alliance to end sexual violence is to create communities free of sexual violence and to provide culturally affirming, trauma-informed advocacy, prevention, and intervention services centered on the voices of survivors.

$6.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of CONNECTICUT ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$645,538
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA NEW BRITAIN SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS SERVICE$1,137,197
WOMEN'S & FAMILIES CENTER$1,049,730
SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT$761,437
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE$705,605
RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC$645,538
SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WATERBURY$638,040
THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION$616,993
THE ROWAN CENTER$603,790
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC$462,184
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$48M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +64%
  • WA
    WOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +2% · 36% of their budget
  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +64% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Project Sage Inc

    Project SAGE creates social change to end interpersonal, relationship violence by challenging attitudes and beliefs about power, control, and gender norms and by advocating for victims and survivors.

    Human Services
    2
    Safe Voices

    The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

    3
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    4
    Domestic Violence Crisis Center

    DVCC's role is to help those experiencing any level of domestic violence and assist them in building a safer environment for the well-being of themselves and their families. Our services include housing and financial advocacy, legal…

    Human Services
    5
    Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

    The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

    Human Services
    6
    Community Beyond Violence

    CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

    7
    Family Crisis Center Inc

    The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

    Human Services
    8
    Domestic Violence Project

    The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

    Human Services
    9
    Crisis Center for Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault

    The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.

    10
    Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

    The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

    Health
    11
    Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc

    The mission of connecticut alliance to end sexual violence is to create communities free of sexual violence and to provide culturally affirming, trauma-informed advocacy, prevention, and intervention services centered on the voices of…

    12
    The Women's Center Inc

    To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Family Justice Inc and the most unlike its peers is Young Womens Christian Association of New Britain Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    9/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC — $8,993,072 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INCSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $6,115,346 · OtherSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INCTHE ROWAN CENTER INC — $4,883,628 · OtherTHE ROWAN CENTER INCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc — $4,468,771 · OtherThe Center For Empowerment And Education IncWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER — $6,820,558 · Human ServicesWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTERSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC — $4,806,264 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INCTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC — $4,642,539 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INCSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC — $3,404,889 · Human ServicesSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INCRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC — $4,155,882 · HealthRAPE CRIS…
    Other$24,460,817Human Services$19,674,250Health$4,155,882

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC — $8,993,072 over 9y, 19% of budgetWOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER — $6,820,558 over 9y, 36% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $6,115,346 over 9y, 90% of budgetTHE ROWAN CENTER INC — $4,883,628 over 9y, 63% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC — $4,806,264 over 9y, 31% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC — $4,642,539 over 9y, 16% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc — $4,468,771 over 9y, 24% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC — $4,155,882 over 9y, 75% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC — $3,404,889 over 9y, 21% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC
    • Who funds WOMEN AND FAMILIES CENTER
    • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    • Who funds THE ROWAN CENTER INC
    • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC
    • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC
    • Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc
    • Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF MILFORD INC
    • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
    • The Center for Family Justice Inc49% of income from government
    • Women and Families Center18% of income from government
    • Rape Crisis Center of Milford Inc6% of income from government
    • Susan B Anthony Project Inc0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph