Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cscmp Talent Center Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$99kCommunity Improvement$15kInternational$500
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,250
Individual grant recipient$3,250
Individual grant recipient$3,250
Individual grant recipient$3,250
Individual grant recipient$3,250
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
Individual grant recipient$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($100k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($15k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%ASSOU SENA ASSAN-LAFONEKOU: $1k → 22%GRAY ISRAEL: $500 → 7%RYAN YAMAOTO: $1k → 10%JULIA BARRIOS: $1k → 11%PAULA HERNANDEZ: $1k → 14%EDGAR OLIVAR: $1k → 14%BUI THY: $500 → 13%BRANDON GREEN: $1k → 8%AMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK: $500 → 16%POLO LORYN GIANNA: $2k → 5%STEINERT HANNAH: $2k → 16%ABHISHEK SOLOMON: $2k → 11%POWELL AMBER: $750 → 21%WANNER CHARLES: $1k → 5%WALKER COLE: $1k → 6%TU'UA LUANA: $2k → 8%EVANS BENJAMIN: $1k → 9%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%CASSIE: $500 → 7%KASZYNSKI YONATAN: $2k → 8%SURATWALA BHAVIK: $2k → 14%CAIN LAUREN: $500 → 12%CLAFLIN BRET GUNTHER: $750 → 22%JACQUELINE MOLINA: $2k → 14%JACKSON THOMAS ONEIL: $2k → 5%GERMAIN NATALIE: $500 → 5%ARRINGTON AMBERLY JO: $2k → 6%HAASE CARSON: $500 → 7%KINNAIRD JOHN: $2k → 14%RISHAB KOHLI: $1k → 14%PELTON JULIA: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
OH
CA
UT
MO
KS
NC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($15k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ukraine$15k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNCIL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS UKRAINE ROUNDTABLE: $15,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS UKRAINE ROUNDTABLE+73 more: $91,096 · Other+73 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationAMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$106,096Education$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,896 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cscmp Talent Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cscmp Talent Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cscmp Talent Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph