Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crozier Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$109kEducation$91kReligion$90kHealth$84kEnvironment$13kScience & Tech$10kCrime & Legal$5kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCLEAN HOSPITAL SCOTT L RAUCH ENDOWED CHAIR DEVELOPMENT OFFICE$10,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$5,000
ST PETER'S CHURCH IN THE GREAT VALLEY$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE$5,000
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,850
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE PRESIDENT'S CIRCLE$2,500
EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL OF PHILADELPHIA$2,500
GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES AND DEFENDERS$2,500
HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL FUND$2,500
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$2,500
PHI BETA KAPPA SOCIETY$2,000
NANTUCKET LAND AND WATER COUNCIL$1,500
NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$1,500
ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Nantucket Historical Society: $6k → 6%ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 7%Worcester Art Museum: $3k → 11%Museum of Fine Arts: $15k → 16%St Peters Church in the Grt Valley: $6k → 6%EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $3k → 22%Episcopal Church Foundation: $10k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%Museum of Fine Arts: $15k → 16%St Peters in the Great Valley: $5k → 6%St Pauls Episcopal Church: $5k → 6%Boston Symphony Orchestra: $4k → 16%St Peters Church in the Great Valley: $5k → 6%St Pauls Episcopal Church: $5k → 6%ST PETER'S CHURCH IN THE GREAT VALLEY: $5k → 6%St Paul's Episcopal Church: $5k → 6%Nantucket Historical Association: $4k → 6%Harvard University: $5k → 8%Nantucket Historical Society: $4k → 6%Wellesley College: $10k → 7%Harvard University: $5k → 8%St Paul's Episcopal Church: $3k → 6%Wellesley College: $10k → 7%Harvard TH Chan Sch Public Health: $4k → 8%Seamen's Church Institute: $5k → 17%Friends of the Nantucket Historical Association: $3k → 6%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%Harvard TH Chan Sch Public Health: $4k → 8%NE Historic Genealogical Society: $15k → 16%Seamens Church Institute: $5k → 17%Nantucket Land Council: $3k → 6%Wellesley College: $5k → 7%Mt Auburn Hospital: $3k → 8%NE Historic Genealogical Society: $13k → 16%Seamans Church Institute: $5k → 17%NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $3k → 6%Wellesley College: $3k → 7%American Ancestors: $5k → 16%Seamans Church Institute: $5k → 17%NE Historic Genealogical Society: $5k → 16%McLean Hospital: $20k → 8%St Paul's Cathedral: $5k → 16%McLean Hospital: $20k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL SCOTT L RAUCH ENDOWED CHAIR DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $10k → 8%St Paul's Cathedral: $5k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $5k → 16%GLAD Boston: $5k → 16%GLAD Boston: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$282k · 33 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$282k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+28%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationScience & TechCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wellesley College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +42%
  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +7%
  • NL
    NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SP
    St Peters Church in the Grt Valley
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • SP
    St Peters in the Great Valley
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

—
2
Nahant Historical Society

To acquire, preserve and interpret artifacts of nahant, massachusetts, illustrating its history, prehistory and that of people associated with it, for the enjoyment, education and enrichment of the public.

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Nantucket Lightship Basket Museum Inc

Promote the awareness and appreciation of lightship baskets and their makers, by educating and engaging the public about the complexity of this art form unique to nantucket. exhibiting historic and contemporary baskets.

Arts & Culture
6
The Company of the Redwood Library and Athenaeum

Founded in 1747 on the enlightenment ideals of intellectual pursuit and civic engagement, the redwood library and athenaeum generates knowledge in the humanities for the benefit of the widest possible audience with nothing in view but the…

—
7
Nantucket Arts Council Inc

Support and encourage a collaborative community of the visual, performing and literary arts through education, grants, scholarships and events.

Arts & Culture
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
North Shore Arts Association of Gloucester Inc

Foster the creation and appreciation of the fine arts by holding art exhibitions; conducting educational programs; acquiring and displaying a permanent collection of representational cape ann works of art; maintaining and preserving our…

—
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
The New England Quarterly

The organization's mission is to encourage the study of new england's history and culture and, through quarterly publication and related activities, to enlighten the public about their significance and diversity.

—
12
Plymouth Antiquarian Society

The Plymouth Antiquarian Society is a non-profit educational institution that collects, preserves, and interprets historic houses and artifacts. The Society uses these resources to tell the story of everyday life in Plymouth and New…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nantucket Historical Association; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YALE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $41,500 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDNE Historic Genealogical Society: $32,500 · OtherNE Historic Genealogical SocietySEAMENS CHURCH INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 · OtherSEAMENS CHURCH INSTITUTE INCSt Pauls Episcopal Church: $17,250 · OtherSt Pauls Episcopal ChurchSt Paul's Cathedral: $12,600 · OtherNantucket Historical Society: $11,000 · OtherMCLEAN HOSPITAL SCOTT L RAUCH ENDOWED CHAIR DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSAINT PETERS CHURCH IN THE GREAT VALLEY: $10,000 · Other+40 more: $68,705 · Other+40 moreMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $33,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE A…THE FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRIENDS OF T…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTOR…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY …WORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & Culture152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $6,050 · Arts & Culture+7 moreWellesley College: $34,730 · EducationWellesley Co…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,500 · EducationPresident an…+2 more: $900 · EducationNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $9,500 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 · EnvironmentEpiscopal Church Foundation: $12,500 · ReligionGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,500 · Health
Other$283,555Arts & Culture$61,050Education$45,130Environment$12,750Religion$12,500Civil Rights$2,500Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWellesley College: $34,730 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Church Foundation: $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $9,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSutton Historical Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINSOR SCHOOL: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORD ACADEMY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN STATE MEDIA GROUP: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACKNOW INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNHA PROPERTIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST STEPHEN'S YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Church Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds 152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Alvord Family Foundation · The Peek Family Foundation Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crozier Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crozier Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester Art Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crozier Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph