Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cronin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$932k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$242k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.3MHealth$1.3MPublic Benefit$903kArts & Culture$316kHuman Services$198kRecreation & Sports$84kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $801k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Marshall Public Schools$242,317
City of Marshall$200,000
Oaklawn Hospital$175,000
City of Marshall$100,000
Playright Sports Academy$84,000
Marshall Public Schools$45,000
Marshall Public Schools$30,000
Fountain Cinic$22,400
Brass Band of Battle Creek$10,000
Marshall Public Schools$10,000
Scouting America Michigan Crossroads Council$5,000
Albion Care Alliance$3,000
City of Marshall-Terra Nova Collective$3,000
Marshall Public Schools$2,386
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Region 3B Area Agency on Aging: $20k → 14%Starr Commonwealth: $75k → 14%Starr Commonwealth: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 13 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$3.8M
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+23%

Still filing today

38%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    ELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +25%
  • BB
    Brass Band of Battle Creek
    4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +34%
  • FOUNTAIN CLINIC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $26k · revenue +361%

Funded once

  • IA
    Innovate Albion Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +314% · 47% of their budget
  • BC
    Battle Creek Family YMCA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
5
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
6
Bucksport Regional Health Center

Bucksport regional health center's mission is to provide medical, dental and other health and community services in the bucksport, maine area. it is a federally qualified health cener.

Health
7
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
8
Bellwood-Antis Public Library

Provide public library services

—
9
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
10
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
11
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
12
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ella E M Brown Charitable Circle; the most unlike its peers is Marshall Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Marshall: $871,500 · OtherCity of MarshallMarshall Public Schools: $811,983 · OtherMarshall Public SchoolsKellogg Community College: $400,000 · OtherKellogg Community CollegeKids 'N' Stuff Children's Museum: $105,000 · Other+14 more: $374,435 · Other+14 moreELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE: $1,257,000 · HealthELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE+1 more: $26,400 · HealthSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $125,000 · Human ServicesREGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $20,000 · Human ServicesBrass Band of Battle Creek: $65,000 · Arts & CultureEASTEND STUDIO & GALLERY: $36,590 · Arts & CultureMARSHALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePLAY RIGHT SPORTS ACADEMY INC: $84,000 · Recreation & SportsBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsWILDER CREEK CONSERVATION CLUB: $9,500 · Environment
Other$2,562,918Health$1,283,400Human Services$145,000Arts & Culture$121,590Recreation & Sports$84,000Animals$10,000Environment$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE: $1,257,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $125,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPLAY RIGHT SPORTS ACADEMY INC: $84,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetInnovate Albion Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetBrass Band of Battle Creek: $65,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetEASTEND STUDIO & GALLERY: $36,590 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFOUNTAIN CLINIC: $26,400 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMARSHALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetREGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PLAY RIGHT SPORTS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Innovate Albion Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brass Band of Battle Creek ↗
  • Who funds EASTEND STUDIO & GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Binder Park Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDER CREEK CONSERVATION CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Battle Creek Community FoundationMI26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Battle Creek Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Albion Community Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cronin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cronin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cronin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cronin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cronin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph