Skip to content

North Carolina · Public charity

Crew Charlotte Inc

To transform the commercial real estate industry by accelerating the advancement of women.

$54k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$33k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$6,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$600k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Crew Charlotte Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$33k33%
FY20232$14k0%
FY20222$18k0%
FY20211$9k0%
FY20204$19k25%
FY20193$27k0%
FY20183$29k0%
FY20173$23kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$92kRecreation & Sports$81k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Commercial Real Estate Women Foundation$80,82483%
Foundation of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte$37,00070%
Queens University of Charlotte$30,00040%
Johnson C Smith University$20,00010%
Winthrop University$5,0001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Crew Charlotte Inc with peer funders

About Crew Charlotte Inc

How much does Crew Charlotte Inc give?
Crew Charlotte Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $33,000, out of $53,912 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Crew Charlotte Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (53%), Recreation & Sports (47%).
Who are Crew Charlotte Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Commercial Real Estate Women Foundation ($81k), Foundation of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte ($37k), Queens University of Charlotte ($30k).
Does Crew Charlotte Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Crew Charlotte Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Blackbaud Giving Fund, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Crew Charlotte Inc based?
Crew Charlotte Inc is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crew Charlotte’s filings →

More from the funding graph