Skip to content

· Private foundation

Craig D and Pamela L Goldman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Religion$2.0MCrime & Legal$150kHealth$75kHuman Services$35kAnimals$30kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$92k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOWA RESCUE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $25k → 16%FRANKLIN LAKES LIONS CLUB: $10k → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES I: $100k → 12%FRANKLIN LAKES LIONS CLUB: $200 → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES I: $50k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grateful Paws

Grateful Paws NJ is a non-profit organization devoted to rescuing stray and abandoned animals throughout New Jersey, providing medical care and helping them to find new homes.

Animals
2
Halfway Home Rescue Inc

Halfway Home Rescue works to promote spay/neuter of feral cats works to find homes for abandoned, abused and homeless cats, dogs and small animals.

Animals
3
Capic-Cat Adoption and Pet Information Center

Capic rescues animals and gets them new homes and does tnr for the community as well as adopting animals, spay neuters returns, and helps owners who cannot afford medical help and vetting on their own We also feed hundreds of animals feral…

Animals
4
Furever Friends Rescue

Adoption services for orphaned pets

—
5
Critical Animal Relief Foundation Nfp

Animal Rescue

Animals
6
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
7
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
8
North Fulton Feline Rescue & Adoption Center Inc
—
9
Feeling Fine Canine and Equine Rescue Inc

rescue rehab rehome medically needy dogs and cats

—
10
Fur Ever Home Cat Sanctuary

Provide loving care & home for approx 120 Feral Cats that are in danger out in streets/unadoptable. TNR projects for feral cat colonies around Horry County. Provide Vet & medication care for animals in-house.

Animals
11
Fuzzy Pawz Rescue Llc

Fuzzy Pawz is a small group of dedicated volunteers who open their homes and their hearts to unwanted dogs and cats. Our non-profit rescue does not have a facility but rather places each animal into a private home. We supply all vet care,…

Animals
12
Animal Assistance Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Focus Inc; the most unlike its peers is Halfway Home Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY INC: $2,000,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY INC+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCHILD FOCUS INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesCHILD FOCU…THE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF…CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR…Lions Club Foundation of Franklin Lakes: $10,200 · Human ServicesSPREAD ARI'S LIGHT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 · HealthHALFWAY HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsFOWA Rescue Inc: $5,000 · Animals
Other$2,005,000Human Services$205,200Health$75,000Animals$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD FOCUS INC: $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSPREAD ARI'S LIGHT FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTHE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOWA Rescue Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank FoundationNJ13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Craig D and Pamela L Goldman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Craig D and Pamela L Goldman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Child Focus Inc: 29% of income from government
  • The Arc of Essex County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Craig D and Pamela L Goldman’s filings →

More from the funding graph