Skip to content

· Private foundation

Craig & Carrie Levering Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.7MHuman Services$610kPhilanthropy$313kHealth$182kReligion$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kInternational$2kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $302k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS$1,105,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$525,000
THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL$155,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$147,200
GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHUR$5,000
LONESTAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION$5,000
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $10k → 8%CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $26k → 14%LONESTAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%LONESTAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%LONESTAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%LONESTAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $1.1M → 14%ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $1.1M → 14%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $155k → 14%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $150k → 14%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $150k → 14%ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $125k → 14%ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $125k → 14%St Marks School of Texas: $125k → 14%ST MARKS SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $100k → 14%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $300k → 14%Southern Methodist University: $300k → 14%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $275k → 14%The Sweetheart Ball Inc: $98k → 14%THE SWEETHEART BALL INC: $98k → 14%THE SWEETHEART BALL INC: $97k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $30k → 14%GEROGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEROGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $20k → 14%Geroge W Bush Presidential Center: $20k → 14%Highland Park United Methodist Chur: $5k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $155k → 14%The Hockaday School: $110k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $25k → 14%CRYSTAL CHARITY: $98k → 14%CRYSTAL CHARITY: $98k → 14%THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $96k → 14%CRYSTAL CHARITY: $23k → 14%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $147k → 14%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $98k → 14%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $98k → 14%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $97k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 12 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$7.3M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+13%

Still filing today

58%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +57%
  • HS
    HOCKADAY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $820k · revenue +44%
  • LS
    LONE STAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +334%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL
    one grant, 2022 · $96k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
11
LeTourneau University

Letourneau university is a comprehensive institution of christian higher education where educators engage learners to nurture christian virtue, to develop competency and ingenuity in their professional fields, to integrate faith and work,…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pilgrimage Historical Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $3,140,000 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXASSouthern Methodist University: $2,552,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $820,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOL+1 more: $190,000 · EducationSWEETHEART BALL INC: $293,200 · OtherSWEETHEART…CRYSTAL CHARITY: $221,500 · OtherCRYSTAL CH…UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $147,200 · OtherUT SOUTHWE…HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHUR: $27,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $27,000 · Other+6 more: $46,500 · Other+6 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $293,200 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $95,500 · PhilanthropyLONE STAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $7,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$6,702,000Other$762,900Philanthropy$409,700Health$7,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $3,140,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $2,552,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $820,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $293,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $95,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLONE STAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPILGRIMAGE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗
  • Who funds PILGRIMAGE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Craig & Carrie Levering Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Craig & Carrie Levering Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Craig & Carrie Levering Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Craig & Carrie Levering Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Craig & Carrie Levering’s filings →

    More from the funding graph