Skip to content
Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $60k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’20
17
’21
11
’22
10
’23
7
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$86kPhilanthropy$75kHealth$61kReligion$56kRecreation & Sports$34kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$6kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k9 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC$5,000
THE BAY PARK CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
FORTY CARROTS OF SARASOTA INC$5,000
WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM$5,000
NAMI OF BRISTOL COUNTY MASSACHUSETTS INC$1,000
NEW BEDFORD YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC$1,000
NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC$1,000
DARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHICK MISSION: $1k → 17%WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $10k → 8%WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $10k → 8%WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $5k → 8%WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $500 → 8%NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC: $1k → 9%NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC: $1k → 9%NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC: $1k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $25k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $16k → 9%MOBILE MINISTRIES INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 12 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$148k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $41k · revenue +2%
  • WH
    Wild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +17%
  • TB
    The Bay Park Conservancy Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +555%

Funded once

  • TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • SP
    ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • NV
    NEW VINTAGE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
2
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
5
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
6
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
9
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
10
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
11
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
12
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Mobile Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC: $20,000 · OtherBAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASO…NEW LIFE SOUTH COAST INC: $10,500 · OtherNEW LIFE SOUTH COAST INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCHNEW VINTAGE CHURCH INC: $10,000 · OtherNEW VINTAGE CHURCH INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherForty Carrots of Sarasota Inc: $5,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $3,500 · OtherNAMI OF BRISTOL COUNTY MASSACHUSETT VENICE: $3,500 · OtherDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $4,000 · Other+9 more: $15,000 · Other+9 moreGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDA…THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH…+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $40,550 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCE…Wild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc: $25,500 · Human ServicesWild Hearts Therapeutic …NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMobile Ministries Inc: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $25,000 · HealthRESILIENT RE…Children's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 · HealthChildren's H…SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthSARASOTA MEM…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 · HealthDana-Farber …The Bay Park Conservancy Inc: $25,000 · Community ImprovementTEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$101,500Philanthropy$81,500Human Services$72,550Health$35,500Community Improvement$25,000Youth Development$10,000Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $40,550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc: $25,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetThe Bay Park Conservancy Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForty Carrots of Sarasota Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMobile Ministries Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW BEDFORD YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MARION INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH SHORE ART CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZEITERION THEATRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Gulf Coast Community …The Carney Family Cha…Alvord Family Foundat…William G and Marie S…Charles & Margery Bar…Southcoast Community …Bristol County Saving…First Citizens Charit…Manatee Community Fou…Boston Foundation IncThe US Charitable Gif…
The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Alvord Family Foundation · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • New Bedford Women's Center Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Child and Family Services Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Zeiterion Theatre Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc: 3% of income from government
  • South Shore Art Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Marion Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Teen Court of Sarasota Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Resilient Retreat Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Craig and Ana Weatherley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home