· Private foundation
Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
59% of Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $60k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k9 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC | $25,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| FORTY CARROTS OF SARASOTA INC | $5,000 |
| WILD HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| THE BAY PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $5,000 |
| BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC | $5,000 |
| NAMI OF BRISTOL COUNTY MASSACHUSETTS INC | $1,000 |
| NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC | $1,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA INC | $1,000 |
| NEW BEDFORD YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| DARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC2× · 2023–2025 · $41k · revenue +2%
- WHWild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +17%
- TBThe Bay Park Conservancy Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +555%
Funded once
- NVNEW VINTAGE CHURCH INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +38%- SPST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Mobile Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC ↗
- Who funds Wild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc ↗
- Who funds The Bay Park Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds RESILIENT RETREAT INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Forty Carrots of Sarasota Inc ↗
- Who funds DARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF BRISTOL COUNTY MASSACHUSETT VENICE ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Mobile Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds NEW BEDFORD YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ZEITERION THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHICK MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE ART CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Alvord Family Foundation · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Craig and Ana Weatherley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Bedford Women's Center Inc — 84% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Child and Family Services Inc — 24% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Zeiterion Theatre Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc — 3% of income from government
- South Shore Art Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Marion Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Teen Court of Sarasota Inc — 0% of income from government
- Resilient Retreat Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.