Skip to content
CP Cares Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

CP Cares Inc

Sale of products, conduct raffles and collect donations from our franchise system for the purpose of funding designated charities.

$209k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$222kHealth$198kHuman Services$42kInternational$16kYouth Development$10kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $139k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$138,995
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SUSAN G KOMEN FUND$25,000
PLEBIAN HELPERS$5,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ADVOCACY ACTION FUND$2,500
TRF FAMILY$2,148
JESUS LUZARDO FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,500
HOLLYWOOD FIREFIGHTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION$1,250
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PLEBEIANHELPERS: $10k → 7%PLEBIAN HELPERS: $5k → 7%SEAFARERS' HOUSE: $750 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$422k · 6 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$422k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+9%

Still filing today

83%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +4%
  • ST
    SIGNATURE TRAVEL NETWORK FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +214%
  • PI
    PLEBEIANHELPERS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • UP
    UNFORGETTABLE PROM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -97%
  • PB
    PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sino-American Cancer Foundation
Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
6
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Shivers Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
The Soloviev Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Signature Travel Network Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $159,400 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIESSUSAN G KOMEN FUND: $25,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherUNFORGETTABLE PROM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $20,564 · Other+11 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $189,724 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,950 · Health+1 more: $1,100 · HealthSIGNATURE TRAVEL NETWORK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropySIGNATURE TRA…GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE F…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUN…ADVOCACY ACTION FUND INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPLEBEIANHELPERS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSEAFARERS' HOUSE INC: $750 · Human ServicesJESUS LUZARDO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$249,964Health$197,774Philanthropy$63,500Human Services$15,750Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $189,724 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIGNATURE TRAVEL NETWORK FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetPLEBEIANHELPERS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNFORGETTABLE PROM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCACY ACTION FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEAFARERS' HOUSE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PROGRESS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CP Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CP Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to CP Cares Inc?

    Find your warmest path to CP Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on CP Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home