Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Covenant Health System

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$1.7M
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$12MEducation$235kArts & Culture$100kPhilanthropy$100kHuman Services$87kCommunity Improvement$60kReligion$50kFood & Nutrition$25k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,712,777
Median grant
1
States reached
$199M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$1,712,777
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 9%SOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION: $35k → 15%HALE CENTER SENIOR CITIZENS ASSC INC: $10k → 22%SOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION: $25k → 15%LUBBOCK FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $37k → 17%LUBBOCK FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $30k → 17%LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $54k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 6 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$10M
$492k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’23
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9.6M · revenue -36%
  • OH
    Oregon Health & Science University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $450k
  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF LUBBOCK TEXAS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k

Funded once

  • LE
    LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +121%
  • LA
    LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
2
Hospice of Lubbock Inc

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Human Services
3
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

4
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
5
Lubbock Economic Development Alliance

To promote economic growth by creating high quality jobs, investing in new capital improvements, retaining and expanding existing businesses and enhancing lubbock's quality of life.

Community Improvement
6
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Foundation
7
Family Legal Services of the South Plains

The family legal services of the south plains works to provide low income clients of the south plains with first-rate legal assistance, advocacy, and quality counsel in matters of family and elder law at free and/or reduced cost.

Crime & Legal
8
Lubbock Impact Inc

To empower the working poor by providing enrichment programs and resources to meet physical, spiritual, and emotional needs. this provides the hope and tools to break generational poverty and build a stronger future. lubbock impact comes…

Human Services
9
Covenant Health System

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
10
Covenant Medical Center

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
11
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
12
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Area United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hale Center Senior Citizens Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $9,566,900 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $1,712,777 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONOregon Health & Science University — $449,590 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF LUBBOCK TEXAS — $100,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $75,000 · OtherLUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC — $68,000 · OtherCARPENTER'S CHURCH — $35,000 · OtherLUBBOCK FAMILY OUTREACH CENTER INC DBA FAMILY GUIDANCE & OUTREACH CENTER — $67,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC — $60,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK DREAM CENTER — $53,625 · Human ServicesBAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesHALE CENTER SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$11,279,677Other$727,590Human Services$210,625Arts & Culture$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$50,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $9,566,900 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $1,712,777 over 1y, 29% of budgetLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC — $68,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLUBBOCK FAMILY OUTREACH CENTER INC DBA FAMILY GUIDANCE & OUTREACH CENTER — $67,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK DREAM CENTER — $53,625 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHALE CENTER SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Garrison Family FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Garrison Family Foundation · Community Foundation of West Texas · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Covenant Health System funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph