Skip to content

· Public charity

Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc

Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$539k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$19MHealth$12k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.2M
$230,435
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA OF PASSAIC AND UNION COUNTY INC$538,801
CASA OF ATLANTIC CAPE MAY AND CAMDEN COUNTIES INC$493,770
CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC$438,304
ESSEX COUNTY CASA INC$427,981
CASA OF MONMOUTH COUNTY INC$255,101
CASA OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC$230,435
CASA OF OCEAN COUNTY INC$200,575
HUDSON COUNTY CASA INC$196,381
CASA OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTY INC$157,255
CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC$149,824
BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC$146,768
CASA OF CUMBERLAND GLOUCESTER AND SALEM$59,677
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $438k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $147k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $153k → 7%CASA OF PASSAIC AND UNION COUNTY INC: $539k → 12%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $432k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $127k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $150k → 7%CASA OF PASSAIC AND UNION COUNTY INC: $501k → 12%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $207k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $101k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $127k → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA INC: $166k → 12%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $172k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $96k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $114k → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA INC: $163k → 12%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $171k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $91k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $113k → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA INC: $134k → 12%CASA OF BURLINGTON AND MERCER COUNTY INC: $164k → 7%BERGEN COUNTY CASA INC: $79k → 7%CASA OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN INC: $95k → 7%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA INC: $133k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 14 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$19M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+27%

Still filing today

79%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF ATLANTIC CAPE MAY & CAMDEN COUNTIESINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +79% · 35% of their budget
  • COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +42% · 43% of their budget
  • CF
    CHILD FOCUS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +759%

Funded once

  • CL
    CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Bastrop Count

The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who provide advocacy services to child victims removed by the state from homes because of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa of Liberty/Chambers Counties

None

Human Services
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Denton County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers, to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, and to promote community awareness about child abuse issues.

Civil Rights
6
Central Georgia Casa Inc

Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…

Civil Rights
7
Court Appointed Special Advocate Guardian Ad Litem of Miami Co Inc

To provide dedicated volunteers to advocate in court for the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect.

Human Services
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc

Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…

Crime & Legal
9
Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights
10
Casa for Kids Inc

Court appointed special advocates are trained community volunteers appointed by a judge to speak up for abused and neglected children in the court system.

Civil Rights
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
12
Court Appointed Special Advocates in the Heart of Texas

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monmouth County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Concussion Legacy Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF CUMBRLNDGLOUCTERSALEM CO INC: $1,626,962 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $1,286,067 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MONMOUTH COUNTY INC: $1,185,185 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…HUDSON COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $1,113,052 · Crime & LegalHUDSON COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECI…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF OCEAN COUNTY INC: $971,306 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $2,058,298 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…CHILD FOCUS INC: $1,929,415 · Human ServicesCHILD FOCUS INCCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES: $1,131,708 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES O…BERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $917,301 · Human ServicesBERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECI…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF ATLANTIC CAPE MAY & CAMDEN COUNTIESINC: $2,792,186 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $1,246,237 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL…ESSEX COUNTY CASA INC: $2,009,195 · OtherESSEX COUNTY CASA …Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc: $938,503 · OtherCourt Appointed Sp…CASA OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $282,804 · OtherCASA OF CAMDEN COU…CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Health
Crime & Legal$6,182,572Human Services$6,036,722Civil Rights$4,038,423Other$3,230,502Health$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF ATLANTIC CAPE MAY & CAMDEN COUNTIESINC: $2,792,186 over 9y, 35% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $2,058,298 over 9y, 43% of budgetCHILD FOCUS INC: $1,929,415 over 9y, 21% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF CUMBRLNDGLOUCTERSALEM CO INC: $1,626,962 over 9y, 23% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY: $1,286,067 over 4y, 68% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $1,246,237 over 9y, 21% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MONMOUTH COUNTY INC: $1,185,185 over 9y, 37% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES: $1,131,708 over 9y, 28% of budgetHUDSON COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $1,113,052 over 9y, 21% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF OCEAN COUNTY INC: $971,306 over 9y, 39% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc: $938,503 over 7y, 26% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $917,301 over 9y, 34% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF ATLANTIC CAPE MAY & CAMDEN COUNTIESINC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD FOCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF CUMBRLNDGLOUCTERSALEM CO INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MONMOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF OCEAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Investors Foundation Inc · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Child Focus Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc?

Find your warmest path to Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey’s filings →

More from the funding graph