Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation

Lead efforts to identify and support initiatives that improve college readiness and ensure more students graduate with a college degree or certification. Partner with education leaders, funders, and regional, state, and national organizations to develop the next generation educational system for el paso.

$482k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to El Paso Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
2
’20
1
’21
3
’22
4
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$145,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Total assets, FY2023
$3.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 74% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEmploymentFood & Nutrition
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20234$237k75%
FY20223$840k67%
FY20211$73k0%
FY20202$55k100%
FY20171$6.8Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$7.8MEmployment$395kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDEA Public Schools: $6,812,400 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHarmony Public Schools: $375,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev Corp: $334,949 over 4y, 57% of budgetVela Education Fund: $300,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEl Paso Matters Inc: $105,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetThe Bridge of Southern New Mexico: $60,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetEl Pasoans Fighting Hunger: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Women's Preparatory Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation with peer funders

About Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation

How much does Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation give?
Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $482,134 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (95%), Employment (5%), Food & Nutrition (0%).
Who are Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: IDEA Public Schools ($6.8M), Harmony Public Schools ($375k), Council on Regional Economic Expansion & Educational Dev Corp ($335k).
Does Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation based?
Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $4k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Council on Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph