· Public charity
Council of Jewish Organizations of Crown Heights
To foster joint and cooperative action for charitable, cultural, educational and human service organizations in its catchment area; helping needy individuals in a respectful way with funds for food, emergency home repairs, emergency medical needs, children's camp and tuition funds to keep them off the streets and out of trouble; to…
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHABAD OF BUSHWICK | $10,100 |
| TORAH TOTS ACADEMY INC | $9,242 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Council of Jewish Organizations of Crown Heights funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Council of Jewish Organizations of Crown Heights. Bigger dots raise more.
- Torah Tots Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Council of Jewish Organizations of Crown Heights’ filings →