Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cotsidas Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$35kHealth$33kReligion$22kCrime & Legal$15kHuman Services$8kPublic Benefit$3kArts & Culture$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EISENHOWER HEALTH$5,000
WPI ANNUAL FUND$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$3,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$2,000
ST KOSMAS ACADEMY$2,000
ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$1,100
MCCALLUM THEATER$1,000
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
CITY OF HOPE$1,000
ST SPYRIDON GREEK ORTHODOX$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$500
CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%BANCROFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $4k → 11%RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $5k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $5k → 11%ANGIE'S QUEST TO CURE ALS: $1k → 12%TURNING POINT USA: $3k → 16%TUCK ANNUAL GIVING: $2k → 10%ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $4k → 11%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $1k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%ANGIE'S QUEST TO CURE ALS: $1k → 12%ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $4k → 11%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $1k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%WORCESTER ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $4k → 11%MCCALLUM THEATER: $1k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%BANCROFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $3k → 11%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $1k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%BANCROFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $3k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CITY OF HOPE: $1k → 14%EISENHOWER HEALTH: $1k → 11%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $10k → 11%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $10k → 11%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $9k → 11%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $9k → 11%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $6k → 11%WPI ANNUAL FUND: $5k → 11%ST KOSMAS ACADEMY: $2k → 11%ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $3k → 11%ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $3k → 11%ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $3k → 11%ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $1k → 11%ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
IN
CT
RI
CA
CO
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 34 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
10

Total granted

$176k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+108%

Still filing today

47%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +136%
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFESPAN CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +75%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
10
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Augies Quest to Cure Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WPI ANNUAL FUND: $50,500 · OtherWPI ANNUAL FUNDSTS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $13,620 · OtherSTS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHBANCROFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $11,800 · OtherBANCROFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDWORCESTER ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $11,500 · OtherWORCESTER ACADEMY ANNUAL FUNDCITY OF HOPE: $7,000 · OtherST SPYRIDON GREEK ORTHODOX: $6,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+28 more: $26,160 · Other+28 moreEisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthEisenhower Medic…SCRIPPS HEALTH: $9,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALS THERAPY DEVE…Augies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $2,000 · HealthAugies Quest to …+1 more: $300 · HealthPacific Legal Foundation: $14,700 · Crime & LegalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $1,600 · EducationRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $2,600 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,100 · Human ServicesCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$132,860Health$27,300Crime & Legal$14,700Education$6,600Philanthropy$3,100Human Services$2,100Membership Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $14,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $2,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOrthodox Christian Laity: $1,700 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Augies Quest to Cure ALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Orthodox Christian Laity ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cotsidas Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cotsidas Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cotsidas’ filings →

More from the funding graph