Skip to content
Cortland Moose Lodge 1012 at a glance

· Public charity

Cortland Moose Lodge 1012

To provide funds for local 501 C 3 Charities from monies raised by the lodge membership.

$318k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $288,630, the rows itemized in this filing. The $318,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,470 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,108
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSMA Museum Inc$36,643
The Healthy Hearts & Paws$26,015
Bloomfield - Mespo Local Schools$25,108
Sleep in Heavenly Peace$25,108
Mecca Fire Dept$25,108
Bristol Local Schools$25,108
Johnston Fire Dept$25,108
OH Branch K9 Search Team$25,108
Greene Rire Dept$25,108
Maplewood Local Schools$25,108
Lakeview Local Schools$25,108
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%OSMA Museum Inc: $37k → 10%Sleep in Heavenly Peace: $25k → 16%Maplewood Local Schools: $17k → 17%Compassion Call Inc: $17k → 19%OSMA: $26k → 10%Bloomfield - Mespo Local Schools: $25k → 16%Greene Rire Dept: $25k → 16%The Healthy Hearts & Paws: $26k → 16%Greene Fire Department: $17k → 16%Lakeview Local Schools: $25k → 16%Maplewood Local Schools: $25k → 16%Mecca Fire Dept: $25k → 16%Lakeview Local Schools: $17k → 16%Community Foundation Of Eastern OH: $17k → 16%Mecca Fire Dept: $17k → 16%Johnston Fire Dept: $25k → 16%Johnston Fire Department: $17k → 16%Bristol Local Schools: $25k → 16%Bristol Local Schools: $17k → 16%Camelot Riding Center: $17k → 16%OH Branch K9 Search Team: $25k → 16%OH Branck K-9 Search Team: $17k → 16%Someplace Safe: $17k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 7 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$317k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+114%

Still filing today

14%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’25’26
Housing & ShelterMembership BenefitReligionHealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $62k · revenue 0%
  • LL
    Lakeview Local Schools
    2× · 2025–2026 · $42k
  • OB
    OHIO BRANCH K9 SEARCH TEAM INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $42k

Funded once

  • WF
    WARREN FAMILY MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $17k · revenue +114%
  • CC
    COMPASSIONS CALL INC
    one grant, 2025 · $17k
  • CC
    Camelot Centergraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $17k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
2
Central Vermont Humane Society Inc

To educate the public in the prevention of cruelty to animals and provide shelter and medical care for homeless animals as well as assist in finding permanent homes for these animals.

Animals
3
Warren Area Ambulance Service Inc

To provide emergency medical service and transport for treatment of the sick or injured when necessary.

Health
4
Humane Association of Warren County -Ohio

To partner with the community to eliminate and prevent cruelty, neglect and homelessness, in order to achieve humane care and quality of life for all companion animals.

Animals
5
Central Pennsylvania Humane Society

To prevent animal neglect and cruelty through education and enforcement while providing a safe haven and finding forever homes for those in need.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
7
West Valley Humane Society Inc

To provide professional and compassionate animal services through shelter, adoption, educational programs, population control and health services while remaining fiscally responsible.

Animals
8
Wayne County Humane Society

The humane society of wayne county provides assistance in pet population control, shelter for lost, abused, and neglected animals, and education for the general public in order to assist them in the proper care and maintenance of pets.

Animals
9
Wenatchee Valley Humane Society Inc

The mission of wvhs is to serve the community through education, protection and pet adoptions. we continue our mission by taking care of displaced pets, rescuing injured and lost animals, providing spay/neuter programs, investigating…

Animals
10
Tiny Hooves Rescue Inc

Tiny hooves is dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, and providing forever sanctuary to abandoned, abused, neglected, and unwanted farm animals while also inspiring positive change within the human and animal bond. we promote a vegan…

Animals
11
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
12
Humane Society of South Central Mi

Animal shelter - provide a safe haven for animals without homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Compassions Call Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lakeview Local Schools: $42,337 · OtherLakeview Local SchoolsOHIO BRANCH K9 SEARCH TEAM INC: $42,337 · OtherOHIO BRANCH K9 SEARCH TEAM INCMaplewood Local Schools: $42,337 · OtherMaplewood Local SchoolsBristol Local Schools: $42,337 · OtherBristol Local SchoolsJohnston Fire Department: $42,337 · OtherJohnston Fire DepartmentMecca Fire Dept: $42,337 · OtherMecca Fire DeptBloomfield - Mespo Local Schools: $25,108 · OtherBloomfield - Mespo Local SchoolsSomeplace Safe: $17,229 · OtherSomeplace SafeOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $62,486 · Membership BenefitOHIO STATE MOO…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $25,108 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN …WARREN FAMILY MISSION: $17,229 · Housing & ShelterWARREN FA…THE HEALTHY HEARTS AND PAWS PROJECT JASON COOKE: $26,015 · AnimalsGreene Rire Dept: $25,108 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND EASTERN OHIO: $17,229 · PhilanthropyCOMPASSIONS CALL INC: $17,229 · ReligionCamelot Center: $17,229 · Health
Other$296,359Membership Benefit$62,486Housing & Shelter$42,337Animals$26,015Public Safety & Disaster$25,108Philanthropy$17,229Religion$17,229Health$17,229

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $62,486 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cortland Moose Lodge 1012 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cortland Moose Lodge 1012. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cortland Moose Lodge 1012’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home