Skip to content
Corridor Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Corridor Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$60kHealth$41kHuman Services$11kEducation$7kCrime & Legal$4kYouth Development$4kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Little Rock Adventist Academy$4,000
Good News Jail and Prison Ministry$2,500
Difference Makers Church$2,000
Mt Airy Net$1,000
Mothers Fighting for Others$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE ANDY TALLEY BONE MARROW FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%Little Rock Adventist Academy: $4k → 17%HAYESVILLE SHOP WITH A HERO: $500 → 14%BLAIRSVILLE SHOP WITH A COP: $1k → 10%HAYESVILLE SHOP WITH A HERO: $500 → 13%GOOD COUNSEL: $500 → 7%LITTLETON YOUNG LIFE: $2k → 8%Good News Jail and Prison Ministry: $3k → 9%LIBERTY HIGH SCHOOL DONATION FOR BAG BINGO FUNDRAISER: $300 → 6%Mt Airy Net: $1k → 6%WEIS: $1k → 6%Difference Makers Church: $2k → 8%LAURAL ADVOCACY & REFERRAL AGENCY SERVICE: $500 → 11%ULMAN FOUNDATION: $20k → 19%LITTLE ROCK ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $2k → 17%BLAIRSVILLE SHOP WITH COP: $1k → 10%TOWNS UNION HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 13%UNCHAINED CHARITIES: $500 → 6%THE WATERBOYZ FOR JESUS: $2k → 6%CMYSP: $4k → 6%UNCUFFED MINISTRIES: $2k → 19%MOUNTAIN SHELTER HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 10%TOWNS COUNTY SHOP WITH A HERO: $500 → 13%RIVER VALLEY RANCH: $4k → 6%SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOWARD COUNTY: $30k → 6%ULMAN CANCER FUND FOR YOUNG ADULTS: $21k → 19%SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOWARD COUNTY: $30k → 6%THE KATRINA TAGGET MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: $600 → 6%THE KATRINA TAGGET MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GOLF TOURNAMENT: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$110k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

40%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
HealthPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentReligionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOWARD COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k
  • UF
    ULMAN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $41k · revenue +33%
  • LR
    LITTLE ROCK ADVENTIST ACADEMY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $6k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • C
    CMYSP
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • UM
    UNCUFFED MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ud Samuel Freeman Charitable Trust
—
2
The Natalia Marie Foundation

Providing peace to families as they bring their angels home

Health
3
Thurman Thomas Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
4
United Charity Foundation
Health
5
Angel Armies

To share God's love by supporting ministries focused on helping the homeless and less fortunate individuals and families.

Religion
6
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
7
Unchained Foundation

To provide peace and create lasting memoriesss for adults and their families facing nlife attering illnesses.

Health
8
Mollys Angels
Philanthropy
9
Unified for Uganda

To support the local destitute children of Northern Uganda funding tuition costs.

—
10
Outside the Bars

Helping kids cope with incarcerated parents.

—
11
The David Mduffy Jr Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates Llp
Philanthropy
12
Archangel Scholarship Foundation

Scholarships awarded to St. Michael's Students

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uncuffed Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Katrina Tagget Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOWARD COUNTY: $60,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS HOWARD COUNTYLITTLE ROCK ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $5,500 · OtherLITTLE ROCK ADVENTIST ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherCMYSP: $3,500 · Other+15 more: $13,771 · Other+15 moreULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 · HealthULMAN FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $250 · HealthBLAIRSVILLE SHOP WITH A COP INC: $2,000 · Public BenefitUNCUFFED MINISTRIES: $1,700 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WATERBOYZ FOR JESUS INC: $1,500 · ReligionKATRINA TAGGET MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationMOTHERS FIGHTING FOR OTHERS INC: $300 · International
Other$86,271Health$41,250Public Benefit$2,000Youth Development$1,700Religion$1,500Education$1,000International$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WATERBOYZ FOR JESUS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMT AIRY NET INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNCHAINED CHARITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMOTHERS FIGHTING FOR OTHERS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANDY TALLEY BONE MARROW FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ULMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAIRSVILLE SHOP WITH A COP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCUFFED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE WATERBOYZ FOR JESUS INC ↗
  • Who funds MT AIRY NET INC ↗
  • Who funds KATRINA TAGGET MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNCHAINED CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS FIGHTING FOR OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDY TALLEY BONE MARROW FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Corridor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Corridor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Corridor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home