Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cornerstone Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.9MEnvironment$2.7MHuman Services$1.0MHealth$940kPhilanthropy$515kSocial Science$340kPublic Benefit$315kCrime & Legal$285k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $690k
$160,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$350,000
ISLAND INSTITUTE$340,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$240,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$240,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$200,000
ROCK THE VOTE$160,000
CHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE$150,000
THE POSSE FOUNDATION$150,000
WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC$125,000
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND$80,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$75,000
THE BASIC FUND$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOR THE LOVE OF CHILDREN: $188k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 13 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$8.0M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-27%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $690k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +121%
  • II
    Island Institute
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +109%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF RUTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • FL
    FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · $188k · revenue -27%
  • TP
    THE POSSE FOUNDATION DC
    one grant, 2023 · $140k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
5
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
11
Institute for the Future

Institute for the future is the world's leading futures organization. our mission is to prepare the world to create better, more equitable futures by disrupting short-term thinking with visions of transformative possibilities.

Education
12
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Island Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Island Institute: $1,125,000 · EducationIsland InstituteCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $715,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVETeach for America Inc: $665,000 · EducationTeach for America IncThurgood Marshall College Fund: $305,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College FundTHE BASIC FUND: $265,000 · EducationTHE BASIC FUNDTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $125,000 · EducationTEACH FOR AMERICA DCMD: $500,000 · OtherTEACH FOR AMERICA DCMDPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $475,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE POSSEE FOUNDATION DC: $375,000 · OtherTHE POSSEE FOUNDATION DCISLAND INSTITUTE: $340,000 · OtherISLAND INSTITUTEBRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $285,000 · OtherBRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICETHE POSSE FOUNDATION DC: $140,000 · OtherTHE POSSE FOUNDATION DCENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,575,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFEN…HOUSE OF RUTH: $1,015,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF RUT…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $390,000 · HealthROCK THE VOTE: $315,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $75,000 · Civil RightsFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $187,500 · Human Services
Education$3,350,000Other$2,115,000Environment$1,575,000Housing & Shelter$1,015,000Health$390,000Civil Rights$390,000Human Services$187,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,575,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIsland Institute: $1,125,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $1,015,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $715,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $665,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $390,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $315,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $305,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BASIC FUND: $265,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $187,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Island Institute ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK THE VOTE ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE BASIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cornerstone Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cornerstone Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cornerstone Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cornerstone Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cornerstone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph