Skip to content

· Public charity

Cooperacin Santa Ana

CSA offers training, coaching, and incubation of worker cooperatives and support for worker cooperative ventures in Santa Ana and Orange County.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$225kEmployment$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$48k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $287,210, the rows itemized in this filing. The $328,520 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,310 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$27,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salsa Food Hub LLC$68,890
La Milpa Cafe LLC$40,000
KIWA of Southern California$32,500
United Taxi Workers San Diego$27,500
Democracy at Work Institute$27,500
Cooperation LA$27,500
Pilipino Workers Ctr of So CA$22,500
Twilight Strategies CA LLC$10,185
AZ Construction Group$9,000
Community Hub de Santa Ana$7,320
Tlaxcali LLC$7,315
Chingrownas LLC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AZ Construction Group: $9k → 10%Democracy at Work Institute: $28k → 10%United Taxi Workers San Diego: $28k → 11%Pilipino Workers Ctr of So CA: $23k → 14%Chingrownas LLC: $7k → 10%DAWI: $24k → 10%UTWSD: $24k → 11%Pilipino Workers Center of So: $19k → 14%Tlaxcali LLC: $7k → 10%Democracy at Work Institute: $24k → 10%United Taxi Workers San Diego: $24k → 11%Pilipino Workers Ctr of So CA: $19k → 14%Salsa Food Hub LLC: $69k → 10%KIWA of Southern California: $33k → 14%Salsa Food Hub LLC: $57k → 10%KIWA of Southern California: $29k → 14%La Milpa Cafe LLC: $40k → 10%Korean Immigrant Workers Advo: $29k → 14%Careshare OC: $14k → 10%Cooperation LA: $28k → 14%Twilight Strategies CA LLC: $10k → 10%Cooperation LA: $24k → 14%Charitable Ventures: $9k → 10%Cooperation LA: $24k → 14%Community Hub de Santa Ana: $7k → 10%Careshare OC LLC: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$493k · 7 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$493k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    Cooperation L A
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +21%
  • UT
    UNITED TAXI WORKERS OF SAN DIEGO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +96%
  • PW
    PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • KI
    Korean Immigrant Workers Advo
    one grant, 2023 · $29k
  • CV
    CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salsa Food Hub LLC: $126,224 · OtherSalsa Food Hub LLCLa Milpa Cafe LLC: $40,000 · OtherLa Milpa Cafe LLCKorean Immigrant Workers Advo: $28,750 · OtherKorean Immigrant Workers AdvoCareshare OC: $20,890 · OtherCareshare OCTwilight Strategies CA LLC: $10,185 · OtherAZ Construction Group: $9,000 · Other+3 more: $21,635 · Other+3 moreKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $61,250 · Community ImprovementKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS…PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $60,000 · Community ImprovementPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER …CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $9,102 · Community ImprovementCHARITABLE VENTURES OF O…Cooperation L A: $75,000 · Arts & CultureCooperation L…UNITED TAXI WORKERS OF SAN DIEGO: $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED TAXI W…DEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE: $75,000 · EmploymentDEMOCRACY AT …
Other$256,684Community Improvement$130,352Arts & Culture$75,000Public Safety & Disaster$75,000Employment$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCooperation L A: $75,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetUNITED TAXI WORKERS OF SAN DIEGO: $75,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetDEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $61,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $9,102 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cooperation L A ↗
  • Who funds UNITED TAXI WORKERS OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Democracy at Work InstituteCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Democracy at Work Institute · Weingart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cooperacin Santa Ana funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cooperacin Santa Ana. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cooperacin Santa Ana?

    Find your warmest path to Cooperacin Santa Ana through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cooperacin Santa Ana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph